IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v10y2025a9070.html

Temporal Dynamics of Power Distribution in Mobile Urban Co-Policies: A Southern Analytical Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Sobral

    (DINÂMIA’CET, University Institute of Lisbon (ISCTE‐IUL), Portugal / Interdisciplinary Centre for Urban Culture and Public Space, TU Wien, Austria)

  • Predrag Milić

    (Interdisciplinary Centre for Urban Culture and Public Space, TU Wien, Austria)

  • Burcu Ateş

    (Interdisciplinary Centre for Urban Culture and Public Space, TU Wien, Austria)

Abstract

This study proposes an analytical framework for scrutinising the temporal dynamics of power distribution within the mobility of urban co-policies, particularly those that aim to enhance socio-spatial justice. The role of time in shaping power dynamics in the new contexts covered by urban co-policies is central to this analysis. The framework is constructed through a comprehensive literature review and empirical fieldwork on the Lisbon mobile co-policy, called Bairros de Intervenção Prioritária/Zonas de Intervenção Prioritárias, which is supplemented by analysis of participatory and contextual policies across cities within the Com.Unity.Lab Transfer Network. Drawing on theories of policy mobility in the context of Southern epistemologies, the framework underscores the significance of temporal dynamics in the formation of policy outcomes, which highlights the necessity of the continuous assessment of policy intermediary results over time. The proposed framework identifies a gap in the analysis of the mobility of co-policies that integrate spatial co-production and co-governance at the neighbourhood scale. Methodologically based on the Southern ethics of inquiry in which time serves as a critical lens through which travelling co-policies are understood, the study offers insights into the need for continuous adaptation with the overarching goal of assessing the extent to which urban co-policies can foster social justice towards fairer cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Sobral & Predrag Milić & Burcu Ateş, 2025. "Temporal Dynamics of Power Distribution in Mobile Urban Co-Policies: A Southern Analytical Framework," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:9070
    DOI: 10.17645/up.9070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/9070
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.9070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Archon Fung & Erik Olin Wright, 2001. "Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance," Politics & Society, , vol. 29(1), pages 5-41, March.
    2. Jamie Peck & Nik Theodore, 2012. "Follow the Policy: A Distended Case Approach," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(1), pages 21-30, January.
    3. Allan Cochrane & Kevin Ward, 2012. "Researching the Geographies of Policy Mobility: Confronting the Methodological Challenges," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(1), pages 5-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colin Lorne, 2024. "Repoliticising national policy mobilities: Resisting the Americanization of universal healthcare," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 42(2), pages 231-249, March.
    2. Keavy McFadden & Robin Wright, 2023. "Social reproduction and public finance: A comparative study of TIF in California and Chicago," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(8), pages 2108-2127, November.
    3. Luke Fairbanks, 2019. "Policy mobilities and the sociomateriality of U.S. offshore aquaculture governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(5), pages 849-867, August.
    4. Yi‐Ling Chen & Chantalle Elisabeth Rietdijk, 2025. "FROM GLOBALIZING TAIPEI TO LEARNING AMSTERDAM: Referencing as a Politicizing Strategy for Urban Development in Taiwan," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 111-125, January.
    5. Astrid Wood, 2016. "Tracing policy movements: Methods for studying learning and policy circulation," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(2), pages 391-406, February.
    6. Kevin Ward & Teresa Abbruzzese & Tim Bunnell & Paolo Cardullo & I-Chun Catherine Chang & Byron Miller & Ramon Ribera-Fumaz & HaeRan Shin & Zachary Spicer & Orlando Woods, 2025. "A comparison of comparisons: Evidence from an international comparative study of ‘smart cities’," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 43(7), pages 1217-1239, November.
    7. Alistair Sheldrick & James Evans & Gabriele Schliwa, 2017. "Policy learning and sustainable urban transitions: Mobilising Berlin’s cycling renaissance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(12), pages 2739-2762, September.
    8. Rachel Bok, 2015. "Airports on the move? The policy mobilities of Singapore Changi Airport at home and abroad," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(14), pages 2724-2740, November.
    9. Keith Shaw & Fred Robinson, 2007. "‘The End of the Beginning’? Taking Forward Local Democratic Renewal in the Post-Referendum North East," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 22(3), pages 243-260, August.
    10. Leigh Johnson, 2013. "Index Insurance and the Articulation of Risk-Bearing Subjects," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 45(11), pages 2663-2681, November.
    11. Euclid Tsakalotos, 2007. "Competitive Equilibrium and the Social Ethos: Understanding the Inegalitarian Dynamics of Liberal Market Economies," Politics & Society, , vol. 35(3), pages 427-446, September.
    12. Jacob Broom, 2021. "Social impact bonds and fast policy: Analyzing the Australian experience," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 113-130, February.
    13. Lily - Trinh Hoang Hong Hue, 2019. "Gender Differences of Citizen Participation in Local Government: The Case of Vietnam," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(3), pages 225-238, December.
    14. Strzelecka, Marianna & Rechciński, Marcin & Tusznio, Joanna & Akhshik, Arash & Grodzińska-Jurczak, Małgorzata, 2021. "Environmental justice in Natura 2000 conservation conflicts: The case for resident empowerment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    15. Edmund Malesky & Markus Taussig, 2019. "How Do Firms Feel About Participation by Their Peers in the Regulatory Design Process? An Online Survey Experiment Testing the Substantive Change and Spillover Mechanisms," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 129-150, June.
    16. Martin Calisto Friant & Walter J. V. Vermeulen & Roberta Salomone, 2024. "Transition to a Sustainable Circular Society: More than Just Resource Efficiency," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 23-42, March.
    17. Yanuar Nugroho & Gindo Tampubolon, 2008. "Network Dynamics in the Transition to Democracy: Mapping Global Networks of Contemporary Indonesian Civil Society," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 13(5), pages 144-160, September.
    18. Ida Andersson & Laura James, 2018. "Altruism or entrepreneurialism? The co-evolution of green place branding and policy tourism in Växjö, Sweden," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3437-3453, November.
    19. Shutian Zhou & Guofang Zhai & Yijun Shi, 2018. "What Drives the Rise of Metro Developments in China? Evidence from Nantong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Merje Kuus, 2015. "For Slow Research," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 838-840, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:9070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.