IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v13y2025a10548.html

Reproductive Equity Support: A Cross‐National Comparison of Medically Assisted Reproduction and Abortion Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Mio Tamakoshi

    (WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Germany)

  • Hannah Zagel

    (TU Dortmund University, Germany)

Abstract

This article offers a new way of classifying and measuring state support for reproductive equity across countries, focusing on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) and abortion. Drawing on the notion of stratified reproduction and comparative welfare state research, we propose a two‐dimensional framework to capture how policies can shape different sets of inequalities and how access to reproductive care is provided. The two dimensions that compose our framework are “permissiveness,” the degree to which government policies enable access to reproductive care by legalizing services, defining who qualifies as a patient, and/or imposing restrictive measures on service delivery, and “generosity,” the extent to which government policies subsidize the costs of authorized services for individuals deemed eligible. We applied the permissiveness–generosity framework to quantitative data on MAR and abortion policies from 2020 from the International Reproduction Policy Database across 30 high‐income countries. We then investigated the cases of Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, which group together in the overall plotting, more in‐depth. The quantitative mapping revealed diverse approaches to reproductive equity, with some countries having both permissive and generous policies, while others focus on one dimension or provide limited support altogether. The case studies show that despite overall trends towards greater reproductive equity in recent decades, state support for individuals’ equal access to MAR and abortion remains limited and has taken different pathways in this group of countries. This study contributes to a better understanding of how state policies promote equal access to reproductive care and enable individuals to pursue their desired reproductive pathways, regardless of their characteristics or socioeconomic position.

Suggested Citation

  • Mio Tamakoshi & Hannah Zagel, 2025. "Reproductive Equity Support: A Cross‐National Comparison of Medically Assisted Reproduction and Abortion Policies," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:10548
    DOI: 10.17645/si.10548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/10548
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.10548?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Obinger, Herbert, 1998. "Federalism, Direct Democracy, and Welfare State Development in Switzerland," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 241-263, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trent J. MacDonald, 2019. "The Political Economy of Non-Territorial Exit," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 18871, June.
    2. Tamakoshi, Mio & Zagel, Hannah, 2025. "Reproductive Equity Support: A Cross‐National Comparison of Medically Assisted Reproduction and Abortion Policies," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13, pages 1-16.
    3. ., 2019. "Economic theory of non-territorial unbundling," Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Non-Territorial Exit, chapter 1, pages 14-38, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. repec:osf:osfxxx:pgd65_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Coban, Mehmet Kerem, 2021. "Power Resources and Income Inequality in Switzerland and Singapore," OSF Preprints pgd65, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:10548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.