IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v13y2025a10389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Exchange, Accessibility, and Trust: Interpreters’ Perspectives of Inclusion in Chinese Welfare Factories (1950s–1990s)

Author

Listed:
  • Jiahui Huang

    (College of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Xiamen University, China)

  • Xiao Zhao

    (College of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Xiamen University, China)

Abstract

This article examines the social inclusion process of early‐generation deaf workers in Chinese welfare factories (1950s–1990s) from the perspective of sign language interpreters. Drawing on oral history interviews with ten interpreters and social exchange theory, the analysis identifies three analytically distinct but sequential phases of social inclusion—initiating trust, reverse inclusion, and social inclusion—each centered on the interplay between accessibility and trust‐building and distinguished by patterns of hedonic value, activity, and referent. The initiating trust phase reveals how interpreters shifted from negative perceptions and inaction to positive engagement, fostering linguistic accessibility and affect‐based trust as they recognized deaf workers’ competence beyond linguistic barriers. Both reverse inclusion and social inclusion are marked by positive hedonic value and high activity, but differ in their primary referents, or agents of action. In reverse inclusion, deaf workers welcome interpreters into the community, deepening linguistic and cultural accessibility and fostering affect‐based trust that surpasses competence‐based trust. They further exercise their agency by petitioning factory leadership to appoint these trusted colleagues as official interpreters. In the social inclusion phase, interpreters use their agency to advance inclusion beyond the factory; the accumulated affect‐, commitment‐, and competence‐based trust from deaf workers empowers interpreters to bridge systemic inaccessibilities outside the factory. Our findings underscore accessibility as both the cornerstone and Achilles’ heel of social inclusion: It emerges as a product of social exchanges and as an enabler of trust at each phase, yet when welfare policies and institutions provide only physical, without linguistic and cultural, access, genuine social inclusion remains impossible.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiahui Huang & Xiao Zhao, 2025. "Social Exchange, Accessibility, and Trust: Interpreters’ Perspectives of Inclusion in Chinese Welfare Factories (1950s–1990s)," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:10389
    DOI: 10.17645/si.10389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/10389
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/si.10389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shahla Akram & Zahid Pervaiz, 2024. "The role of institutions and social inclusion in trust building," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 3887-3903, August.
    2. Parry, Geraint, 1976. "Trust, Distrust and Consensus," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 129-142, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert E. Goodin, 2000. "Trusting Individuals Versus Trusting Institutions," Rationality and Society, , vol. 12(4), pages 381-395, November.
    2. Patti Tamara Lenard, 2008. "Trust Your Compatriots, but Count Your Change: The Roles of Trust, Mistrust and Distrust in Democracy," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(2), pages 312-332, June.
    3. Liman Man Wai Li & Xiaobin Lou & Michael Harris Bond, 2025. "Confidence in Societal Institutions Extends Citizens’ Radius of Trust, Leading to Even Greater Life Satisfaction in Societies with Stronger Rule of Law," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 20(2), pages 809-831, April.
    4. Shahla Akram & Zahid Pervaiz, 2025. "Assessing Inequality of Opportunities for Child Well-being in Pakistan," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 18(2), pages 525-542, April.
    5. Geißel, Brigitte, 2006. "Politische Kritik - Gefahr oder Chance? Normative Grundlagen politischer Orientierungen," Discussion Papers, Research Group Civil Society, Citizenship and Political Mobilization in Europe SP IV 2006-401, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v13:y:2025:a:10389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.