IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v7y2019i1p60-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU Agencies and the Energy Union: Providing Useful Information to the Commission?

Author

Listed:
  • Torbjørg Jevnaker

    (Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, Norway / Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Norway)

  • Barbara Saerbeck

    (Federation of German Consumer Organizations, Germany / Environmental Policy Research Centre, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

The development of the energy policy of the European Union (EU) has been accompanied by organizational reforms of the EU’s energy bureaucracy. Much attention has been paid to Commission President Juncker’s reorganization of the European Commission, including how this has influenced the Energy Union initiative. The establishment of EU agencies has also expanded the EU administration and the capacity for developing new initiatives and coordinating implementation of EU legislation. However, recent research has not been sufficiently connected to policy studies on energy, climate and environment. This article analyses the extent to which two EU agencies—the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators, and the European Environmental Agency—augment the policymaking capacity of the Commission by providing information that aids its work. The article ends with a discussion of the potential implications of agencification.

Suggested Citation

  • Torbjørg Jevnaker & Barbara Saerbeck, 2019. "EU Agencies and the Energy Union: Providing Useful Information to the Commission?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 60-69.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v7:y:2019:i:1:p:60-69
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v7i1.1781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/1781
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v7i1.1781?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morten Egeberg & Jarle Trondal, 2017. "Researching European Union Agencies: What Have We Learnt (and Where Do We Go from Here)?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 675-690, July.
    2. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:881-901 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Christopher J. Bickerton & Dermot Hodson & Uwe Puetter, 2015. "The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 703-722, July.
    4. Steffen Bauer, 2006. "Does Bureaucracy Really Matter? The Authority of Intergovernmental Treaty Secretariats in Global Environmental Politics," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 6(1), pages 23-49, February.
    5. Dovilė Rimkutė, 2015. "Explaining Differences in Scientific Expertise Use: The Politics of Pesticides," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 114-127.
    6. Michael Blauberger & Berthold Rittberger, 2015. "Conceptualizing and theorizing EU regulatory networks," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(4), pages 367-376, December.
    7. Andrew Tarrant & R. Daniel Kelemen, 2017. "Reconceptualizing European Union regulatory networks: A response to Blauberger and Rittberger," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 213-222, June.
    8. Maria Martens, 2010. "Voice or Loyalty? The Evolution of the European Environment Agency (EEA)," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 881-901, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonas J. Schoenefeld, 2021. "The European Green Deal: What Prospects for Governing Climate Change With Policy Monitoring?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 370-379.
    2. Kacper Szulecki & Dag Herald Claes, 2019. "Towards Decarbonization: Understanding EU Energy Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 1-5.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Torbjørg Jevnaker & Barbara Saerbeck, 2019. "EU Agencies and the Energy Union: Providing Useful Information to the Commission?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 60-69.
    2. Marta Migliorati, 2020. "The Post‐agencification Stage between Reforms and Crises. A Comparative Assessment of EU agencies' Budgetary Development," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(6), pages 1393-1412, November.
    3. Reini Schrama, 2023. "Expert network interaction in the European Medicines Agency," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 491-511, April.
    4. Buket Oztas & Amie Kreppel, 2022. "Power or Luck? The Limitations of the European Commission's Agenda Setting Power and Autonomous Policy Influence," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 408-426, March.
    5. Giorgio Monti & Bernardo Rangoni, 2022. "Competition Policy in Action: Regulating Tech Markets with Hierarchy and Experimentalism," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 1106-1123, July.
    6. Eckert, Sandra, 2020. "EU agencies in banking and energy between institutional and policy centralisation," SAFE Working Paper Series 278, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    7. Sarah Arras & Jan Beyers, 2020. "Access to European Union Agencies: Usual Suspects or Balanced Interest Representation in Open and Closed Consultations?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 836-855, July.
    8. Jarle Trondal & Stefan Gänzle & Benjamin Leruth, 2022. "Differentiation in the European Union in Post‐Brexit and ‐Pandemic Times: Macro‐Level Developments with Meso‐Level Consequences," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(S1), pages 26-37, September.
    9. Kacper Szulecki & Dag Herald Claes, 2019. "Towards Decarbonization: Understanding EU Energy Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 1-5.
    10. Jacint Jordana, 2017. "Transgovernmental Networks as Regulatory Intermediaries," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 670(1), pages 245-262, March.
    11. Sebastian Diessner & Philipp Genschel, 2025. "Monetary‐Fiscal Interactions and the Problem of Outdated Commitments: Eurozone Crisis Versus Covid‐19," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    12. Diessner, Sebastian, 2024. "Monetary-Fiscal Interactions and the Problem of Outdated Commitments: Eurozone Crisis Versus Covid-19," OSF Preprints vwrgs, Center for Open Science.
    13. Tomas Adam & Oxana Babecka Kucharcukova & Jan Babecky & Vojtech Belling & Sona Benecka & Jan Bruha & Kamil Galuscak & Tomas Holub & Eva Hromadkova & Lubos Komarek & Zlatuse Komarkova & Kamila Kulhava , 2015. "Analyses of the Czech Republic's Current Economic Alignment with the Euro Area 2015," Occasional Publications - Edited Volumes, Czech National Bank, Research and Statistics Department, number as15 edited by Kamila Kulhava & Lucie Matejkova.
    14. Michael W. Manulak, 2017. "Leading by design: Informal influence and international secretariats," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 497-522, December.
    15. Jan Beyers & Sarah Arras, 2021. "Stakeholder consultations and the legitimacy of regulatory decision‐making: A survey experiment in Belgium," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 877-893, July.
    16. Viviane Gravey & Aron Buzogány, 2021. "For Farmers or the Environment? The European Parliament in the 2013 CAP Reform," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 16-28.
    17. Aukje van Loon, 2021. "European Financial Governance: FTT Reform, Controversies and Governments’ Responsiveness," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 208-218.
    18. David Krogmann, 2024. "Here to stay? Challenges to liberal environmentalism in regional climate governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 288-300, May.
    19. Mattia Guidi & Igor Guardiancich, 2018. "Intergovernmental or supranational integration? A quantitative analysis of pension recommendations in the European Semester," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(4), pages 684-706, December.
    20. Karin Vaagland, 2021. "Crisis-Induced Leadership: Exploring the Role of the EU Commission in the EU–Jordan Compact," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 52-62.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v7:y:2019:i:1:p:60-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.