IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v14y2026a11751.html

County Election Administration Promotes Voter Confidence in US Elections for Election Losers

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. Ritter

    (School of Politics, Philosophy, and Public Affairs, Washington State University‐Pullman, USA)

Abstract

Does high-quality county election administration (CEA)—the center of US elections—add to public confidence in US elections, including among election losers? No study has examined how CEA quality throughout the US and over time affects this outcome. Specifically, this study evaluates the hypotheses that, from 2012 to 2022, higher quality CEA leads to higher public confidence in election results and enhances this confidence among election losers. These hypotheses are evaluated using the new CEA (Ritter & Tolbert, 2024) index. Using the Survey of the Performance of American Elections data (from 2012 to 2022), coupled with multi-level modeling, this study evaluates the impact of CEA on public confidence for election winners and losers. Ultimately, this study finds that higher quality CEA helps close the confidence gap between election losers and winners.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. Ritter, 2026. "County Election Administration Promotes Voter Confidence in US Elections for Election Losers," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 14.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11751
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.11751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/11751
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.11751?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v14:y:2026:a:11751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.