IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v13y2025a9282.html

Addressing Migrant Inequality in Youth Political Engagement: The Role of Parental Influences

Author

Listed:
  • Simona Guglielmi

    (Department of Social and Political Sciences, University of Milan, Italy)

  • Nicola Maggini

    (Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

While citizenship acquisition varies across the EU, children of immigrants are expected to comprise a growing share of the voting-age population in the coming years. Consequently, understanding the factors influencing their political integration has garnered increasing attention from researchers and policymakers. Existing studies highlight the complex and context-dependent interplay of structural, cultural, and policy-related factors that shape immigrant political engagement. Additionally, some scholars have noted that the standard model of youth political socialisation—where political learning is transmitted from parent to child—may be “disrupted” in immigrant families. Against this backdrop, this article investigates the critical role of family political discussions and parent–child political alignment in (re)producing ethnic inequalities in political engagement among late adolescents, using Lombardy (Italy) as a case study. The project MAYBE—Moving into Adulthood in uncertain times: Youth Beliefs, future Expectations, and life choices (University of Milan) collected survey data from 2,756 final-year high school students (aged 18–19) between February 2023 and March 2024, including 620 students with migrant backgrounds. The study applied a multilevel regression model—spanning 81 schools, 165 classes—to investigate individual and contextual factors, such as the classroom political climate and municipal electoral competitiveness. Migrant parents navigate the host country’s political environment with varying levels of familiarity, shaped by their connections to the political culture of their country of origin. Findings suggest that these dynamics create unique pathways for the political socialisation of their children, in which the influence of socioeconomic status and intergenerational social learning on political engagement differs significantly from the patterns observed among native-born youth.

Suggested Citation

  • Simona Guglielmi & Nicola Maggini, 2025. "Addressing Migrant Inequality in Youth Political Engagement: The Role of Parental Influences," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:9282
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.9282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/9282
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.9282?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fox, Richard L. & Lawless, Jennifer L., 2014. "Uncovering the Origins of the Gender Gap in Political Ambition," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 108(3), pages 499-519, August.
    2. Federico Farini, 2019. "Inclusion Through Political Participation, Trust from Shared Political Engagement: Children of Migrants and School Activism in Italy," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1121-1136, November.
    3. Veronica Riniolo & Livia Elisa Ortensi, 2021. "Young Generations' Activism in Italy: Comparing Political Engagement and Participation of Native Youths and Youths from a Migrant Background," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 923-955, February.
    4. Anna Lührmann & Marcus Tannenberg & Staffan I. Lindberg, 2018. "Regimes of the World (RoW): Opening New Avenues for the Comparative Study of Political Regimes," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 60-77.
    5. Anna Lührmann & Marcus Tannenberg & Staffan I. Lindberg, 2018. "Regimes of the World (RoW): Opening New Avenues for the Comparative Study of Political Regimes," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 60-77.
    6. Brambor, Thomas & Clark, William Roberts & Golder, Matt, 2006. "Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 63-82, January.
    7. Vanessa A Boese, 2019. "How (not) to measure democracy," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 22(2), pages 95-127, June.
    8. Oshrat Hochman & Gema García-Albacete, 2019. "Political Interest among European Youth with and without an Immigrant Background," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 257-278.
    9. repec:sae:mrxval:v:39:y:2005:i:1:p:103-140 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Rosa Gatti & Alessio Buonomo & Salvatore Strozza, 2024. "Immigrants’ political engagement: gender differences in political attitudes and behaviours among immigrants in Italy," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1753-1777, April.
    11. Kroh, Martin & Selb, Peter, 2009. "Inheritance and the Dynamics of Party Identification," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 31(4), pages 559-574.
    12. Oshrat Hochman & Gema García-Albacete, 2019. "Political Interest among European Youth with and without an Immigrant Background," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 257-278.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kelly Morrison & Daniela Donno & Burcu Savun & Perisa Davutoglu, 2025. "Competing judgments: Multiple election observers and post-election contention," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 293-321, June.
    2. Lars Pelke, 2023. "Reanalysing the link between democracy and economic development," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 26(4), pages 361-383, December.
    3. Aleksandra Nojković & Milojko Arsić & Emilija Milošević, 2025. "Cross-country determinants of COVID19 mortality and the manipulation of death data in autocratic regimes," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 52(4), pages 839-862, November.
    4. Boese-Schlosser, Vanessa A. & Eberhardt, Markus, 2023. "How Does Democracy Cause Growth?," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Transformations of Democracy SP V 2023-501, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    5. Raul Caruso & Emma Galli & Giulia Tringali, 2025. "Does corruption trigger political violence? Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa (1970-2020)," DISCE - Working Papers del Dipartimento di Politica Economica dipe0053, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    6. Heiko Giebler & Saskia P. Ruth & Dag Tanneberg, 2018. "Why Choice Matters: Revisiting and Comparing Measures of Democracy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10.
    7. Henri Njangang & Youssouf Nvuh-Njoya, 2023. "Unravelling the link between democracy and economic complexity: fresh evidence from the Varieties of Democracy data," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 1-32, March.
    8. Nicole Stoelinga & Tuuli Tähtinen, 2025. "Conflict and Democratic Preferences," CESifo Working Paper Series 12178, CESifo.
    9. Godfred Bonnah Nkansah, 2022. "Youth Cohort Size, Structural Socioeconomic Conditions, and Youth Protest Behavior in Democratic Societies (1995–2014)," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    10. Annemieke van den Dool & Caroline Schlaufer, 2024. "Policy process theories in autocracies: Key observations, explanatory power, and research priorities," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 41(6), pages 865-891, November.
    11. Farida Jalalzai & Steve Jurek, 2023. "The “Accidental Candidate” Versus Europe’s Longest Dictator: Belarus’s Unfinished Revolution for Women," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 119-129.
    12. Nicole J Saam & Carmen Friedrich & Henriette Engelhardt, 2022. "The value conflict between freedom and security: Explaining the variation of COVID-19 policies in democracies and autocracies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Dean Schafer & Seraphine F. Maerz & Carsten Q. Schneider & Alexandra Krasnokutskaya, 2025. "“Strongmen” Don't Redistribute: Illiberal Leaders on the Right and Worsening Economic Inequality," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 13.
    14. Amir Tayebi & Sheida Teimouri, 2025. "Democratization and knowledge in social sciences," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 202(1), pages 77-108, January.
    15. Garbe, Lisa & Maerz, Seraphine F. & Freyburg, Tina, 2026. "Authoritarian collaboration and repression in the digital age: balancing foreign direct investment and control in internet infrastructure," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 85-108.
    16. Gründler, Klaus & Krieger, Tommy, 2021. "Using Machine Learning for measuring democracy: A practitioners guide and a new updated dataset for 186 countries from 1919 to 2019," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    17. Boese-Schlosser, Vanessa & Eberhardt, Markus, 2025. "Democracy in decline: The economic implications of democratic collapse," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Transformations of Democracy SP V 2025-502, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    18. Sibo Liu & Alexey Makarin & Jinfeng Wu & Dong Zhang, 2026. "The War of Ideas: Institutions and Global Media Bias," CESifo Working Paper Series 12459, CESifo.
    19. Andrew Boutton, 2019. "Of terrorism and revenue: Why foreign aid exacerbates terrorism in personalist regimes," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(4), pages 359-384, July.
    20. Tiziana La Rocca & Maurizio La Rocca & Francesco Fasano & Alfio Cariola, 2023. "Does a country's environmental policy affect the value of small and medium sized enterprises liquidity in the energy sector?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 277-290, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v13:y:2025:a:9282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.