IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v11y2023i3p45-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Debate on the European Union’s Future From the Perspective of Regional Members of Parliament

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeth Donat

    (Department for European Policy and the Study of Democracy, University for Continuing Education Krems, Austria)

  • Simon Lenhart

    (Institute of Political Science, FernUniversität in Hagen, Germany)

Abstract

Differentiated integration has become ubiquitous in the European Union today. However, the evaluation of differentiated integration by the academic community is much contested: While some see it as a remedy to political gridlock, others think of it as the beginning of the end of the EU (i.e., disintegration). Our article sheds light on the relationship between differentiated integration and disintegration from the viewpoint of subnational members of Parliament. Assuming that at least some scenarios of differentiated integration are related to disintegration, we report on data from a survey of seven EU member states about subnational members of Parliament’s preferences regarding future scenarios for the EU. Our results find that a preference for a Europe with a singular focus on “nothing but the single market” is related to a functionalist approach towards European integration and the perceived disintegration of the EU. This preference is especially prevalent among subnational MPs in the Czech Republic and Poland, both known for having opt-out solutions. While the Czech Republic constantly shows high levels of Euroscepticism in public surveys, the reverse is true in Poland. Obviously, a general commitment to the EU should not be equated with a shared common goal of further European integration. If such differences become permanent, European integration may genuinely be endangered.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth Donat & Simon Lenhart, 2023. "The Debate on the European Union’s Future From the Perspective of Regional Members of Parliament," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 45-58.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:45-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/6746
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hans Vollaard, 2014. "Explaining European Disintegration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(5), pages 1142-1159, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martijn Huysmans & Sven Van Kerckhoven, 2023. "The Causes and Modes of European Disintegration," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 1-4.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brigitte Pircher & Karl Loxbo, 2020. "Compliance with EU Law in Times of Disintegration: Exploring Changes in Transposition and Enforcement in the EU Member States between 1997 and 2016," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1270-1287, September.
    2. V. Sidenko, 2017. "The crisis processes in the EU development: origins and prospects," Economy and Forecasting, Valeriy Heyets, issue 1, pages 7-30.
    3. Brigitte Pircher, 2022. "EU Public Procurement Policy During Covid-19: A Turning Point for Legitimate EU Governance?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 131-142.
    4. Cunico, Giovanni & Aivazidou, Eirini & Mollona, Edoardo, 2021. "Building a dynamic theory of citizens’ awareness of European Cohesion Policy interventions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(2), pages 758-773.
    5. Anne Elizabeth Stie & Jarle Trondal, 2020. "Introducing the Study of Nordic Cooperation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 1-10.
    6. Petros E. Ioannatos, 2021. "Brexit or Euro for the UK? Evidence from Panel Data," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 63(1), pages 117-138, March.
    7. Catherine E. De Vries, 2023. "How Foundational Narratives Shape European Union Politics," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 867-881, July.
    8. Tim Haughton, 2017. "Editorial: Take Back Control: The European Union in 2016," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55, pages 5-7, September.
    9. Tomasz Rosiak, 2015. "Fiscal Capacity For Euro Area – Towards A Bigger Eu Budget?," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 6(3), pages 45-60, September.
    10. Helen Wallace, 2017. "The JCMS Annual Review Lecture: In the Name of Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55, pages 8-18, September.
    11. Markéta PEKARČà KOVà & Michaela STANà ČKOVÃ, 2022. "Analysis of the current integration process: from the past to the future of the European Union," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 13, pages 116-139, December.
    12. Anne Elizabeth Stie & Jarle Trondal, 2020. "Introducing the Study of Nordic Cooperation," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 332-341.
    13. Markus Gastinger, 2021. "Introducing the EU exit index measuring each member state’s propensity to leave the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(3), pages 566-585, September.
    14. Ivan Josipovic & Sieglinde Rosenberger & Helena Segarra, 2023. "Policy Entrepreneurs of European Disintegration? The Case of Austrian Asylum Governance After 2015," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(3), pages 79-90.
    15. Mats Braun, 2020. "Postfunctionalism, Identity and the Visegrad Group," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 925-940, July.
    16. Lindner, Vincent & Eckert, Sandra & Nölke, Andreas, 2022. "Political science research on the reasons for the (non) adoption and (non) implementation of EMU reform proposals: The state of the art," SAFE Working Paper Series 339, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    17. Ekrem Yasar Akcay, 2018. "Possible Effects Of Uk?S Separation From Eu," International Journal of Social Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, March.
    18. Tim Haughton, 2016. "Beelines, Bypasses and Blind Alleys: Theory and the Study of the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54, pages 65-82, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v:11:y:2023:i:3:p:45-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.