IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v9y2021i4p134-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?

Author

Listed:
  • Brahim Zarouali

    (Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Natali Helberger

    (Institute for Information Law, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Claes H. de Vreese

    (Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Algorithms are widely used in our data-driven media landscape. Many misconceptions have arisen about how these algorithms work and what they can do. In this study, we conducted a large representative survey (N = 2,106) in the Netherlands to explore algorithmic misconceptions. Results showed that a significant part of the general population holds (multiple) misconceptions about algorithms in the media. We found that erroneous beliefs about algorithms are more common among (1) older people (vs. younger people), (2) lower-educated people (vs. higher-educated), and (3) women (vs. men). In addition, it was found that people who had no specific sources to inform themselves about algorithms, and those relying on their friends/family for information, were more likely to have algorithmic misconceptions. Conversely, media channels, school, and having one’s own (online) experiences were found to be sources associated with having fewer algorithmic misconceptions. Theoretical implications are formulated in the context of algorithmic awareness and the digital divide. Finally, societal implications are discussed, such as the need for algorithmic literacy initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Brahim Zarouali & Natali Helberger & Claes H. de Vreese, 2021. "Investigating Algorithmic Misconceptions in a Media Context: Source of a New Digital Divide?," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 134-144.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:9:y:2021:i:4:p:134-144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4090
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carmi, Elinor & Yates, Simeon J., 2020. "What do digital inclusion and data literacy mean today?," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sanne Kruikemeier & Sophie C. Boerman & Nadine Bol, 2021. "How Algorithmic Systems Changed Communication in a Digital Society," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 116-119.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephanie Diepeveen & Melanie Pinet, 2022. "User perspectives on digital literacy as a response to misinformation," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(S2), October.
    2. Kira Allmann & Roxana Radu, 2023. "Digital footprints as barriers to accessing e‐government services," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 84-94, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:9:y:2021:i:4:p:134-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.