IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/seapas/y2014i5p217-222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professional Judgement. The Key To A Successful Audit

Author

Listed:
  • Anca Oana CHIȘ

    (Faculty of Economics 1 December1918 University, Alba Iulia)

  • Andra Maria ACHIM

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Babes Bolyai University ClujNapoca)

Abstract

Professional judgement represents the key to a succesful audit engagement. In order for the auditors to use their professional judgment correctly, they must know the rules and standards, both those related to accounting and audit.ISA 200 emphasizes the importance of exercising professional judgment in the planning phase and in the auditor's audit work. Judgment is exercised by an auditor whose training, knowledge and experience have assisted in developing the skills needed to achieve reasonable judgments. The article is a theoretical one, its main objective being the study of professional judgement in audit engagements. Professional judgment was analyzed using a qualitative research methodology, taking into considerationdefinitions from auditing standards and presenting the work of researchers all over the world, while emphasizing specific situations in which judgement is used. Our study draws the attention to the importance of the professional judgement during audit and the obligation of each auditor to use it appropriately.

Suggested Citation

  • Anca Oana CHIȘ & Andra Maria ACHIM, 2014. "Professional Judgement. The Key To A Successful Audit," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 5, pages 217-222, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2014:i:5:p:217-222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/SPAS_5_30.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mathias Dewatripont, 1994. "Auditor professional judgement, implications for regulation and the law: discussion," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/9671, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. David Hatherly, 1999. "The future of auditing: the debate in the UK," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 51-65.
    3. D. Eric Hirst & Lisa Koonce, 1996. "Audit Analytical Procedures: A Field Investigation," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 457-486, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olivier Herrbach, 2001. "Audit quality, auditor behaviour and the psychological contract," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 787-802.
    2. Adam Esplin & Karim Jamal & Shyam Sunder, 2018. "Demand for and Assessment of Audit Quality in Private Companies," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(3), pages 319-352, September.
    3. Hughes, Susan B. & Sander, James F. & Higgs, Scott D. & Cullinan, Charles P., 2009. "The impact of cultural environment on entry-level auditors’ abilities to perform analytical procedures," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 29-43.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13774 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Jeffrey R. Cohen & Gregory M. Trompeter, 1998. "An Examination of Factors Affecting Audit Practice Development," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 481-504, December.
    6. Lambert, Tamara A. & Jones, Keith L. & Brazel, Joseph F. & Showalter, D. Scott, 2017. "Audit time pressure and earnings quality: An examination of accelerated filings," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 50-66.
    7. Richard Macve, 2010. "Conceptual frameworks of accounting: Some brief reflections on theory and practice," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 303-308.
    8. Clive Lennox, 1999. "Are large auditors more accurate than small auditors?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 217-227.
    9. Yang, Seunghee & Lee, Woo-Jong & Lim, Youngdeok & Yi, Cheong H., 2021. "Audit firm operating leverage and pricing strategy: Evidence from lowballing in audit industry," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    10. Asare, S. K. & Wright, A., 1997. "Hypothesis revision strategies in conducting analytical procedures," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 22(8), pages 737-755, November.
    11. Joseph F. Brazel & Keith L. Jones & Mark F. Zimbelman, 2009. "Using Nonfinancial Measures to Assess Fraud Risk," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(5), pages 1135-1166, December.
    12. Ozili, Peterson K, 2018. "Advances and Issues in Fraud Research: A Commentary," MPRA Paper 84879, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Alia Miledi & Benoit Pigé, 2013. "Le Jugement Professionnel En Audit : Enquete Aupres Des Associes Signataires," Post-Print hal-01002359, HAL.
    14. Sweeney, John T. & Suh, Ik Seon & Dalton, Kenneth C. & Meljem, Sylvia, 2017. "Are workpaper reviews preparer-specific?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 560-577.
    15. Phuong Thi Nguyen, 2023. "The application of analytical procedures in Big Four audit firms in Vietnam ," GATR Journals afr229, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    16. Saiewitz, Aaron & Kida, Thomas, 2018. "The effects of an auditor's communication mode and professional tone on client responses to audit inquiries," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 33-43.
    17. Kimberly K. Moreno & Sudip Bhattacharjee & Duane M. Brandon, 2007. "The Effectiveness of Alternative Training Techniques on Analytical Procedures Performance," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 983-1014, September.
    18. Hermanson, Dana R., 2015. "“Model 2”—A personal journey in pursuit of creativity and impact," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 130-140.
    19. Krista Fiolleau & Kris Hoang & Karim Jamal & Shyam Sunder, 2013. "How Do Regulatory Reforms to Enhance Auditor Independence Work in Practice?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 864-890, September.
    20. Janvrin, Diane & Mascha, Maureen Francis, 2014. "The financial close process: Implications for future research," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 381-399.
    21. Jans, Mieke & Alles, Michael & Vasarhelyi, Miklos, 2013. "The case for process mining in auditing: Sources of value added and areas of application," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Professional judgement; Scepticism; Audit engagement; Audit opinion;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2014:i:5:p:217-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.