IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v71y2018i22p36-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scoring Systems for Qualified Immigration by International Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Luise Sophie König
  • Carla Rhode
  • Tanja Stitteneder

Abstract

In the competition for international specialists, some traditional destinations for immigration rely on so-called point systems. Although point systems are often part of potential-oriented immigration systems, they allow for demand-oriented control. Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Austria already apply this type of potential-oriented immigration. In terms of design, the countries' point systems differ considerably in some respects, including the criteria taken into account, procedure, quotas and fees. In Germany, Baden-Württemberg is now the first region to test the points-based immigration of skilled workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Luise Sophie König & Carla Rhode & Tanja Stitteneder, 2018. "Scoring Systems for Qualified Immigration by International Comparison," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 71(22), pages 36-41, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:71:y:2018:i:22:p:36-41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2018-22-koenig-rhode-stitteneder-migration-punktesystem-2018-11-22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F22 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Migration
    • J61 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Geographic Labor Mobility; Immigrant Workers
    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:71:y:2018:i:22:p:36-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.