IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mehr Licht oder mehr Schatten? – Kritische Anmerkungen zum RV-Leistungsverbesserungsgesetz


  • Eckart Bomsdorf


In seinem Kommentar nimmt Eckart Bomsdorf, Universität zu Köln, Stellung zu den Rentenreformplänen der Bundesregierung. Seiner Meinung nach enthält der Gesetzesentwurf sowohl Positives, z.B. bei der Erwerbsminderungsrente, als auch Widersprüchliches, z.B. bei der sogenannten Rente mit 63. Die volle Rentenkasse verführe zu Wohltaten. Vernachlässigt werde, dass die Belastungen für die Rentenversicherung dauerhaft seien, die in der Rentenkasse vorhandenen Ersparnisse jedoch nur einmal ausgegeben werden könnten.

Suggested Citation

  • Eckart Bomsdorf, 2014. "Mehr Licht oder mehr Schatten? – Kritische Anmerkungen zum RV-Leistungsverbesserungsgesetz," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 67(09), pages 12-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:67:y:2014:i:09:p:12-17

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Rentenreform; Gesetzliche Rentenversicherung; Rentenpolitik; Bevölkerungsentwicklung; Flexible Altersgrenze; Deutschland;

    JEL classification:

    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • J11 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts
    • J14 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination
    • J26 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Retirement; Retirement Policies


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:67:y:2014:i:09:p:12-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Klaus Wohlrabe). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.