IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v66y2013i17p20-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Controvery over Public Spending for Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Manfred Schöpe

Abstract

The political efforts to define the next EU medium-term financial framework and for the further development of EU agricultural policy have given rise to critical discussion. This commentary presents a number of facts that reflect the current state of the political proceedings. Starting from the agro-economic conditions of the first decade after the war and the beginnings of the European integration process, the author sheds light on the development of European agricultural policy, discusses the need for subsidies for European farmers and presents the burdens that consumers and taxpayers bear as a result of the agricultural policy. The author’s concludes that despite all its unwieldiness, EU agricultural policy has been a success.

Suggested Citation

  • Manfred Schöpe, 2013. "Controvery over Public Spending for Agriculture," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 66(17), pages 20-29, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:66:y:2013:i:17:p:20-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2013_17_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anja Rohwer & Anja Hülsewig, 2010. "The EU's Common Agricultural Policy - curse or blessing?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 63(03), pages 27-36, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Husemann, Christoph & Novković, Nebojša, 2014. "Farm Management Information Systems: A Case Study On A German Multifunctional Farm," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(2), pages 1-13, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q14 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Finance
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:66:y:2013:i:17:p:20-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.