IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v61y2008i17p03-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

End of the Hauptschule – solution to the education dilemma?

Author

Listed:
  • Annette Schavan
  • Siegfried Schneider
  • Wilfried Bos
  • Ernst Rösner
  • Klaus Klemm
  • Kerstin Schneider
  • Dieter Dohmen

Abstract

Should the German school system be transformed into a two-track structure of secondary schools and Gymnasium and the Hauptschule (lower-achiever secondary school) be abolished? Annette Schavan, Federal Minister for Education and Research, favours keeping the Hauptschule: "A strong Hauptschule was, is and remains the school for trade, technical and social occupations." Simple demands for an abolition of the Hauptschule neither benefits the youths nor the dedicated teachers. Instead each kind of school ought to be given the chance of offering an education that could be the prerequisite for another phase of education and training. Furthermore, one should not overlook the pedagogical quality that prevails in particular at the Hauptschule. This opinion is supported by Siegfried Schneider, the Bavarian State Minister for Education and Culture, who also argues against the abolition of the Hauptschule. He refers to the example of the Bavarian school system that in its entirety is said to be high-performing. Instead of abolishing the Hauptschule, it would be more important to strengthen it specifically. In contrast, Wilfried Bos and Ernst Rösner, University of Dortmund, confirm the decline of the Hauptschule. They are, however, sceptical about the alternative of a two-track system, as this retains early selection as a German characteristic and would also hold on to the self-contained Gymnasium. In the view of Bos und Rösner only those schools can be successful on a sustained basis that (also) offer the educational standards of a Gymnasium. Need for action is also seen by Klaus Klemm, University of Duisburg-Essen. In his opinion, the abolition of the Hauptschule and its integration into other forms of schools would create a development setting that would offer, above all, more development chances to weaker youths. Kerstin Schneider, University of Wuppertal, refers to the differences among individual federal states. The Hauptschule has not become a "loser school" in all federal states. Especially in rural regions the Hauptschule has a high level of education. For Dieter Dohmen, Research Institute for Education and Social Economics, Berlin, it is also consistent, especially when considering the demographic development and the changing transitional conduct, to rethink the existence of this school form. However, an essential problem of the German education system, i.e. the large share of young people leaving school before graduation, can not be solved by abolishing the Hauptschule.

Suggested Citation

  • Annette Schavan & Siegfried Schneider & Wilfried Bos & Ernst Rösner & Klaus Klemm & Kerstin Schneider & Dieter Dohmen, 2008. "End of the Hauptschule – solution to the education dilemma?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 61(17), pages 03-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:61:y:2008:i:17:p:03-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2008_17_1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:61:y:2008:i:17:p:03-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.