IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Erreurs méthodologiques dans l’évaluation des projets d’investissement


  • Marcel Boyer


Despite recent developments and lessons in investment project evaluation, analytical errors persist, representing as many approaches that do not conform to best practice. In this article, we present five of these errors, all sources of bias in the valuation of investments?: Using the government?s cost of financing as the cost of capital (discount rate) in the valuation of public investments rather than an approach incorporating the cost of risk transferred and borne by taxpayers?; Using the company?s weighted average cost of capital (WACC) to evaluate all investments rather than differentiated rates based on project risk levels and profiles?; Using Net Present Value (NPV), with a single discount rate, of a project?s cash flows when the project depends on multiple sources of systematic risk rather than an optimized NPV approach (NPV-O)?; Using the NPV when the project manager can modify, accelerate, slow down, or even postpone or abandon the project in progress rather than a Real Options Valuation (ROV) approach?; Using the legal identity of partners in public-private partnership projects rather than the nature of the risks actually shared and supported by each. Although these errors are more relevant in some cases in the public sector and in other cases in the private sector, they are found in numerous investment decisions in both sectors. They can cause significant losses of value for private and public firms and organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel Boyer, 2018. "Erreurs méthodologiques dans l’évaluation des projets d’investissement," Revue française d'économie, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(4), pages 49-80.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:rferfe:rfe_184_0049

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: restricted

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: restricted

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:rferfe:rfe_184_0049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.