IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/refaef/ecofi_125_0287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les banques islamiques sont-elles si islamiques que cela ? Conséquences en matière de fonds propres réglementaires

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Bitar
  • Philippe Madiès

Abstract

In theory, Islamic banks are profit-and-loss-sharing (PLS) institutions. Nevertheless, literature shows that, in practice, Islamic banks rely mainly on mark-up financing techniques compared to a marginal share of PLS instruments. In this paper, we demonstrate that the Islamic banks intermediation model is not very different from the conventional banks model. First, we report pure and hybrid models to reflect the activities practiced by Islamic banks. Second, we show that Islamic banks use PLS arrangement at their liability side but mark-up financing techniques at their assets side. Islamic banks financing modes are driven by Mourabaha contract that represent almost 80% of their activities. Finally, we employ a sample of 656 banks ? including 116 Islamic ones ? to examine the impact of their preferred intermediation model and find that Islamic banks have higher capitalization in the form of risk-based and non-risk-based capital ratios than conventional counterparts. Classification JEL: G20, G21, P43.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Bitar & Philippe Madiès, 2017. "Les banques islamiques sont-elles si islamiques que cela ? Conséquences en matière de fonds propres réglementaires," Revue d'économie financière, Association d'économie financière, vol. 0(1), pages 287-312.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:refaef:ecofi_125_0287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=ECOFI_125_0287
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-financiere-2017-1-page-287.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bitar, Mohammad & Tarazi, Amine, 2019. "Creditor rights and bank capital decisions: Conventional vs. Islamic banking," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 69-104.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G20 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - General
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • P43 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Finance; Public Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:refaef:ecofi_125_0287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-financiere.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.