Firm-Specific Learning and the Nature of the Firm. Why Transaction Costs May Provide an Incomplete Explanation
This article discusses the limits of a purely transaction cost explanation of the existence of the firm by pointing to additional factors. A simple heuristic model shows that firm-specific learning effects can overcome the costs of monitoring employees, and explain the existence of the firm even in the absence of transaction costs related to the market mode of organisation. Comparing the relative importance of transaction cost and capabilities explanations for the existence of the firm, there is no a priori reason to assume the supremacy of one type of explanation over the other. We argue that a conjoint research program, encompassing both transaction costs and capabilities, must be developed and tested empirically.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_582_0331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.