IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v66y2021i11id232-2020-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative effectiveness of interventions for treating interdigital necrobacillosis in cattle: A network meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • MA Torehanov

    (Department of Biological Safety, Kazakh National Agrarian University, Almaty, Kazakhstan)

  • ZK Tulemissova

    (Department of Biological Safety, Kazakh National Agrarian University, Almaty, Kazakhstan)

  • AS Ibazhanova

    (Department of Biological Safety, Kazakh National Agrarian University, Almaty, Kazakhstan)

  • ER Rafikova

    (Department of Pharmacology and General Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Novosibirsk State Agrarian University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)

  • B Muzapbarov

    (Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan)

  • EM Korabaev

    (Department of Biological Safety, Kazakh National Agrarian University, Almaty, Kazakhstan)

  • ST Siyabekov

    (Department of Biological Safety, Kazakh National Agrarian University, Almaty, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of different antimicrobial agents against interdigital necrobacillosis (IN) in cattle to identify the treatment with the greatest benefit. A network meta-analysis was used to synthesise empirical results from randomised controlled trials. Four studies with five interventions for 565 animals were included. The meta-analysis found no significant differences between the risk ratios for the antimicrobials versus placebo. However, ceftiofur sodium administered intramuscularly at a dose of 1.0 µg/kg body weight every 24 h for 3 days showed a better clinical response than 6.6 µg of oxytetracycline, 2.5 µg of tulathromycin, the placebo and 0.1 µg of ceftiofur sodium. The results show the best efficacy for 6.6 µg of oxytetracycline and 1.0 µg of ceftiofur sodium. Nevertheless, the latter is likely to be superior to oxytetracycline in terms of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Thus, 1.0 µg of ceftiofur sodium appears to provide the best therapeutic activity against IN in cattle. Further well-designed studies are required.

Suggested Citation

  • MA Torehanov & ZK Tulemissova & AS Ibazhanova & ER Rafikova & B Muzapbarov & EM Korabaev & ST Siyabekov, 2021. "Comparative effectiveness of interventions for treating interdigital necrobacillosis in cattle: A network meta-analysis," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(11), pages 461-469.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:66:y:2021:i:11:id:232-2020-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/232/2020-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/232/2020-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/232/2020-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/232/2020-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stacy Sneeringer & Gianna Short & Matthew MacLachlan & Maria Bowman, 2020. "Impacts on Livestock Producers and Veterinarians of FDA Policies on Use of Medically Important Antibiotics in Food Animal Production," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(4), pages 674-694, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlson, Andrea & Greene, Catherine & Raszap Skorbiansky, Sharon & Hitaj, Claudia & Ha, Kim & Cavigelli, Michel & Ferrier, Peyton & McBride, William, 2023. "U.S. Organic Production, Markets, Consumers, and Policy, 2000-21," USDA Miscellaneous 333551, United States Department of Agriculture.
    2. Axelle Poizat & Sabine Duvaleix & Jill Hobbs, 2022. "How does transaction governance in the animal supply chain influence antibiotic use? A study of the French young bull sector," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1890-1908, December.
    3. Abdullah Kaviani Rad & Angelika Astaykina & Rostislav Streletskii & Yeganeh Afsharyzad & Hassan Etesami & Mehdi Zarei & Siva K. Balasundram, 2022. "An Overview of Antibiotic Resistance and Abiotic Stresses Affecting Antimicrobial Resistance in Agricultural Soils," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-27, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:66:y:2021:i:11:id:232-2020-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.