IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpse/v68y2022i8id164-2022-pse.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of aeroponics and conventional system of production of potato mini-tubers in the conditions of the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Milan Čížek
  • Zuzana Komárková

    (Potato Research Institute Havlíčkův Brod, Ltd., Havlíčkův Brod, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Aeroponics would appear to have a number of potential attributes to make potato production more efficient. In a 3-year experiment, from 2019 to 2021, potatoes were grown in aeroponic units using two nutrient solutions as well as in a conventional polycarbonate greenhouse in a substrate. Potato cultivars Adéla, Zuza and Ornella were used in all experiment years. No statistically significant effect of nutrient solution or potato cultivar on the number and weight of tubers was found in the trial. However, the advantages of aeroponics over conventional technology were statistically proven. The number of tubers per plant in aeroponic units ranged from 2.4 (2019, cv. Adéla) to 41.0 (2021, cv. Zuza), while in the greenhouse, they ranged from 3.9 (2019, cv. Adéla) up to 12.6 (2021, cv. Adéla). The average weight of tubers in aeroponic units ranged between 2.0 g and 9.9 g per plant (2 to 10 successive harvests), and in the greenhouse, 22.7 g to 41.9 g per plant (single harvest). The influence of cultivar on the average weight of tubers within individual cultivation technology variants was statistically proven only for polycarbonate greenhouse: only one harvest after the end vegetation.

Suggested Citation

  • Milan Čížek & Zuzana Komárková, 2022. "Comparison of aeroponics and conventional system of production of potato mini-tubers in the conditions of the Czech Republic," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(8), pages 366-374.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:68:y:2022:i:8:id:164-2022-pse
    DOI: 10.17221/164/2022-PSE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/164/2022-PSE.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/164/2022-PSE.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/164/2022-PSE?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F.F. Montesano & M.W. van Iersel & A. Parente, 2016. "Timer versus moisture sensor-based irrigation control of soilless lettuce: Effects on yield, quality and water use efficiency," Horticultural Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 43(2), pages 67-75.
    2. N. G. Tzortzakis & C. D. Economakis, 2008. "Impacts of the substrate medium on tomato yield and fruit quality in soilless cultivation," Horticultural Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 35(2), pages 83-89.
    3. K. Rykaczewska, 2016. "The potato minituber production from microtubers in aeroponic culture," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(5), pages 210-214.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. E. Marinou & A. Chrysargyris & N. Tzortzakis, 2013. "Use of sawdust, coco soil and pumice in hydroponically grown strawberry," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(10), pages 452-459.
    2. K. Rykaczewska, 2016. "Field performance of potato minitubers produced in aeroponic culture," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(11), pages 522-526.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:68:y:2022:i:8:id:164-2022-pse. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.