IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brf/journl/v1y2003i2p217-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Clientele Effect in the Brazilian Market: Are Investors Irrational?

Author

Listed:
  • Jairo Laser Procianoy

    (EA/UFRGS)

  • Rodrigo dos Santos Verdi

    (The Wharton School, University of Pennsilvanya)

Abstract

This work tests the dividend clientele effect in the Brazilian stock market between 1989 and 1993, a period during which there no dividends taxes varied between zero and 25% according to shareholders group. From a sample of 693 events studied, 47% showed first ex-dividend day stock price higher than in the previous day. These findings were against theoretical predictions and investors attitudes may be considered irrational because they were paying more for ex-dividend shares than for cum-dividend ones. Sample segmentation by year showed no difference. Financial institutions and first group stock yield had lower abnormal returns than other. Positive abnormal returns of 1,4% in the first ex-dividend day was found, 0,1% significant. Five days abnormal returns following last cum-dividends day study showed that stock prices increased and returned to the original price few days later.

Suggested Citation

  • Jairo Laser Procianoy & Rodrigo dos Santos Verdi, 2003. "The Clientele Effect in the Brazilian Market: Are Investors Irrational?," Brazilian Review of Finance, Brazilian Society of Finance, vol. 1(2), pages 217-242.
  • Handle: RePEc:brf:journl:v:1:y:2003:i:2:p:217-242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rbfin/article/download/1129/334
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rbfin/article/view/1129
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    dividends; taxes; clientele effect; Brazil;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G35 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Payout Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brf:journl:v:1:y:2003:i:2:p:217-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marcio Laurini (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.