IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Legal Valences Of Good Faith In The Context Of Consumerist Relations Within The European Union

  • Gheorghe, BONCIU

    (“Constantin Brâncoveanu” University, Romania)

Registered author(s):

    The study aims a critical examination of the concept of good faith in relation to unfair terms in consumer contracts present in terms of legal regulations specific to the European Union. Addressing on all matters relating to the origin, meaning and evolution of good faith in the present dependence on unfair terms in consumer contracts, I have followed the extent to which good faith is a universal remedy apparently resorting equally to justice and litigants, being nothing but a measure of morality into the legal. At the same time, the good faith standard acts as valence ethical behavior of the persons, being able to remove unfair terms in contracts concluded between consumers and professionals, its content is influenced by social factors and is emphasized both of moral doctrine and the law

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.strategiimanageriale.ro/papers/130527.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Constantin Brancoveanu University in its journal Management Strategies Journal.

    Volume (Year): 22 (2013)
    Issue (Month): Special ()
    Pages: 198-208

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:23:y:2013:i:s:p:198-208
    Contact details of provider: Phone: 004-0248-221098
    Web page: http://www.univcb.ro/

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:23:y:2013:i:s:p:198-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dan MICUDA)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.