IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brc/journl/v23y2013isp198-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal Valences Of Good Faith In The Context Of Consumerist Relations Within The European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Gheorghe, BONCIU

    (“Constantin Brâncoveanu” University, Romania)

Abstract

The study aims a critical examination of the concept of good faith in relation to unfair terms in consumer contracts present in terms of legal regulations specific to the European Union. Addressing on all matters relating to the origin, meaning and evolution of good faith in the present dependence on unfair terms in consumer contracts, I have followed the extent to which good faith is a universal remedy apparently resorting equally to justice and litigants, being nothing but a measure of morality into the legal. At the same time, the good faith standard acts as valence ethical behavior of the persons, being able to remove unfair terms in contracts concluded between consumers and professionals, its content is influenced by social factors and is emphasized both of moral doctrine and the law

Suggested Citation

  • Gheorghe, BONCIU, 2013. "Legal Valences Of Good Faith In The Context Of Consumerist Relations Within The European Union," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 22(Special), pages 198-208.
  • Handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:23:y:2013:i:s:p:198-208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.strategiimanageriale.ro/papers/130527.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    good faith; unfair terms; equity; consumer contracts; professionals; consumers;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K12 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Contract Law
    • K22 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Business and Securities Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:23:y:2013:i:s:p:198-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan MICUDA (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.univcb.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.