IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brc/brccej/v9y2024i3p51-57.html

Protecting Financial Integrity In The Digital Age: Current Challenges In Accounting And Financial Auditing

Author

Listed:
  • Silviu - Ionel STOICA

    (“Valahia” University of Targoviste, Romania)

  • Beatrice - Elena GORE

    (“Valahia” University of Targoviste, Romania)

Abstract

Protecting financial integrity and managing associated risks are key priorities in accounting and financial auditing, especially in the context of the transformations brought about by the digital age. In this new landscape, the adoption of e-invoices and the use of the virtual space provided by ANAF become essential to improve the efficiency and security of financial and tax processes. Various studies have highlighted the benefits of e-invoices, including reducing human issue, preventing fraud, and increasing transparency in the audit process. Furthermore, the virtual space at ANAF provides quick access to information, allows secure transmission of documents and simplifies interaction with tax authorities. However, the implementation of these tools is not without challenges, such as the need to ensure compatibility with existing systems and guarantee data security in the evolving digital environment. However, e-invoices and virtual space from ANAF remain essential in promoting transparency and compliance in the financial and tax fields. In order to maximize the benefits of these instruments and meet the changing demands of the legislative and technological environment, further research and development in this area is vital.

Suggested Citation

  • Silviu - Ionel STOICA & Beatrice - Elena GORE, 2024. "Protecting Financial Integrity In The Digital Age: Current Challenges In Accounting And Financial Auditing," Contemporary Economy Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 9(3), pages 51-57.
    • Handle: RePEc:brc:brccej:v:9:y:2024:i:3:p:51-57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revec.ro/papers/240307.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alain Cohn & Tobias Gesche & Michel André Maréchal, 2022. "Honesty in the Digital Age," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 827-845, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zakaria Babutsidze & Nobuyuki Hanaki & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2019. "Digital Communication and Swift Trust," Post-Print halshs-02409314, HAL.
    2. Hermann, Daniel & Bruns, Selina & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2025. "Card or dice? An improved experimental approach to measure dishonesty," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Zakaria Babutsidze & Nobuyuki Hanaki & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2021. "Nonverbal content and trust: An experiment on digital communication," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 59(4), pages 1517-1532, October.
    4. Jantsje M. Mol & Eline C. M. Heijden & Jan J. M. Potters, 2020. "(Not) alone in the world: Cheating in the presence of a virtual observer," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 23(4), pages 961-978, December.
    5. Elias Fernández Domingos & Inês Terrucha & Rémi Suchon & Jelena Grujić & Juan Burguillo & Francisco Santos & Tom Lenaerts, 2022. "Delegation to artificial agents fosters prosocial behaviors in the collective risk dilemma," Post-Print hal-04296038, HAL.
    6. repec:ces:ceswps:_10841 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Huber, Christoph & Litsios, Christos & Nieper, Annika & Promann, Timo, 2023. "On social norms and observability in (dis)honest behavior," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1086-1099.
    8. Klockmann, Victor & von Schenk, Alicia & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2025. "Artificial intelligence, distributional fairness, and pivotality," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Chugunova, Marina & Sele, Daniela, 2022. "We and It: An interdisciplinary review of the experimental evidence on how humans interact with machines," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Dickinson, David L. & McEvoy, David M., 2020. "Further from the Truth: The Impact of In-Person, Online, and mTurk on Dishonest Behavior," IZA Discussion Papers 13686, IZA Network @ LISER.
    11. Murakami, Yutaro & Taguchi, Satoshi, 2025. "How gender and prosociality affect machine interaction in tax compliance: A game-theoretic experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    12. Lohse, Tim & Qari, Salmai, 2021. "Gender differences in face-to-face deceptive behavior," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 1-15.
    13. Marius Protte & Behnud Mir Djawadi, 2025. "Human vs. Algorithmic Auditors: The Impact of Entity Type and Ambiguity on Human Dishonesty," Papers 2507.15439, arXiv.org.
    14. repec:osf:osfxxx:2nxv8_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Zakaria Babutsidze & Nobuyuki Hanaki & Adam Zylbersztejn, 2020. "Nonverbal content and swift trust: An experiment on digital communication," Working Papers 2008, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Etienne (GATE Lyon St-Etienne), Université de Lyon.
    16. Victor Klockmann & Alicia von Schenk & Marie Claire Villeval, 2021. "Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, and Diffused Pivotality," Working Papers halshs-03237453, HAL.
    17. Dickinson, David L. & McEvoy, David M., 2020. "Further from the Truth: The Impact of In-Person, Online, and mTurk on Dishonest Behavior," IZA Discussion Papers 13686, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Puchu Zhao & Guohua He & Jian Guan, 2026. "The Ethical Costs of Artificial Intelligence: Investigating How and When Workplace Artificial Intelligence Usage Promotes Employee Unethical Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 203(3), pages 531-547, January.
    19. Victor Klockmann & Alicia von Schenk & Marie Claire Villeval, 2025. "Artificial intelligence, distributional fairness, and pivotality," Post-Print hal-05165240, HAL.
    20. Cristina Bicchieri & Eugen Dimant & Silvia Sonderegger, 2020. "It's Not a Lie If You Believe the Norm Does Not Apply: Conditional Norm-Following with Strategic Beliefs," CESifo Working Paper Series 8059, CESifo.
    21. Hedfeld, Patrick, 2025. "Implicit decision voting made by humans as normative and implementable rules with the help of language models," ifid Schriftenreihe: Beiträge zu IT-Management & Digitalisierung, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifid Institut für IT-Management & Digitalisierung, volume 3, number 315649 edited by FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifid Institut für IT-Management & Digitalisierung.
    22. Ann‐Kathrin Crede & Frauke von Bieberstein, 2020. "Reputation and lying aversion in the die roll paradigm: Reducing ambiguity fosters honest behavior," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(4), pages 651-657, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brc:brccej:v:9:y:2024:i:3:p:51-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina GANESCU (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.univcb.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.