IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/sagmbi/v9y2010i1n8.html

Dealing with Heterogeneity between Cohorts in Genomewide SNP Association Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Lebrec Jeremie J

    (Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands)

  • Stijnen Theo

    (Leiden University Medical Center)

  • van Houwelingen Hans C

    (Leiden University Medical Center)

Abstract

In Genomewide association (GWA) studies investigating thousands of SNPs, large sample sizes are needed to obtain a reasonable power after correction for multiple testing. To obtain the necessary sample sizes, data from different populations/cohorts are combined. The problem of pooling evidence across cohorts bears some resemblance with meta-analysis of clinical trials, and in fact classical meta-analytic methodologies from that field are typically used in GWAs. However, in genetics, it can be expected that the cohorts show some amount of heterogeneity in the association measures that are used for significance testing. In this paper, we demonstrate how it is possible to exploit this heterogeneity to improve our ability to detect influential genetic variants. We also discuss how pathway analysis based on summary data can help resolve heterogeneity. The current standard method for testing SNPs across cohorts in GWAs will miss heterogeneous but important genetic variants affecting complex diseases. Our new testing strategy has the potential to detect them while maintaining sensitivity to variants with homogeneous effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Lebrec Jeremie J & Stijnen Theo & van Houwelingen Hans C, 2010. "Dealing with Heterogeneity between Cohorts in Genomewide SNP Association Studies," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-22, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:9:y:2010:i:1:n:8
    DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1503
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1544-6115.1503?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jelle J. Goeman & Sara A. Van De Geer & Hans C. Van Houwelingen, 2006. "Testing against a high dimensional alternative," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(3), pages 477-493, June.
    2. John PA Ioannidis & Nikolaos A Patsopoulos & Evangelos Evangelou, 2007. "Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses of Genome-Wide Association Investigations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(9), pages 1-7, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong Guo & Changliang Zou & Zhaojun Wang & Bin Chen, 2014. "Empirical likelihood for high-dimensional linear regression models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 77(7), pages 921-945, October.
    2. Peter Jensen, 2010. "Testing the null of a low dimensional growth model," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 193-215, February.
    3. Ping-Yu Wang & Zong-Hua Gao & Zhong-Hua Jiang & Xin-Xin Li & Bao-Fa Jiang & Shu-Yang Xie, 2013. "The Associations of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in miR-146a, miR-196a and miR-499 with Breast Cancer Susceptibility," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-7, September.
    4. repec:plo:pone00:0185355 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. repec:plo:pone00:0056963 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Ningning Xu & Aldo Solari & Jelle J. Goeman, 2023. "Closed testing with Globaltest, with application in metabolomics," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1103-1113, June.
    7. Long Qu & Tobias Guennel & Scott L. Marshall, 2013. "Linear Score Tests for Variance Components in Linear Mixed Models and Applications to Genetic Association Studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 883-892, December.
    8. Jiang Dandan & Sun Jianguo, 2017. "Group Tests for High-dimensional Failure Time Data with the Additive Hazards Models," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, May.
    9. Lan, Wei & Zhong, Ping-Shou & Li, Runze & Wang, Hansheng & Tsai, Chih-Ling, 2016. "Testing a single regression coefficient in high dimensional linear models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 154-168.
    10. Liu, Yang & Sun, Wei & Hsu, Li & He, Qianchuan, 2022. "Statistical inference for high-dimensional pathway analysis with multiple responses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    11. He, Yi & Jaidee, Sombut & Gao, Jiti, 2023. "Most powerful test against a sequence of high dimensional local alternatives," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 151-177.
    12. Zihuai He & Min Zhang & Seunggeun Lee & Jennifer A. Smith & Sharon L. R. Kardia & V. Diez Roux & Bhramar Mukherjee, 2017. "Set-Based Tests for the Gene–Environment Interaction in Longitudinal Studies," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(519), pages 966-978, July.
    13. Bin Guo & Song Xi Chen, 2016. "Tests for high dimensional generalized linear models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(5), pages 1079-1102, November.
    14. Chaturvedi Nimisha & Menezes Renée X. de & Goeman Jelle J. & Wieringen Wessel van, 2018. "A test for detecting differential indirect trans effects between two groups of samples," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 17(5), pages 1-11, October.
    15. Ping-Shou Zhong & Tao Hu & Jun Li, 2015. "Tests for Coefficients in High-dimensional Additive Hazard Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 42(3), pages 649-664, September.
    16. Long Feng & Changliang Zou & Zhaojun Wang, 2016. "Multivariate-Sign-Based High-Dimensional Tests for the Two-Sample Location Problem," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 721-735, April.
    17. Coren L Apicella & David Cesarini & Magnus Johannesson & Christopher T Dawes & Paul Lichtenstein & Björn Wallace & Jonathan Beauchamp & Lars Westberg, 2010. "No Association between Oxytocin Receptor (OXTR) Gene Polymorphisms and Experimentally Elicited Social Preferences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(6), pages 1-8, June.
    18. Gong, Siliang & Zhang, Kai & Liu, Yufeng, 2018. "Efficient test-based variable selection for high-dimensional linear models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 17-31.
    19. Zhao-Yang Wang & Keke Zhao & Jingwei Zheng & Brian Rossmiller & Cristhian Ildefonso & Manas Biswal & Pei-quan Zhao, 2014. "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association between Complement Factor H I62V Polymorphism and Risk of Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy in Asian Populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-8, February.
    20. Kyung-Won Hong & Seok Won Jeong & Myungguen Chung & Seong Beom Cho, 2014. "Association between Expression Quantitative Trait Loci and Metabolic Traits in Two Korean Populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    21. Rui Wang & Xingzhong Xu, 2021. "A Bayesian-motivated test for high-dimensional linear regression models with fixed design matrix," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1821-1852, August.
    22. Wang, Siyang & Cui, Hengjian, 2015. "A new test for part of high dimensional regression coefficients," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 187-203.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:9:y:2010:i:1:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyterbrill.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.