Dealing with Heterogeneity between Cohorts in Genomewide SNP Association Studies
In Genomewide association (GWA) studies investigating thousands of SNPs, large sample sizes are needed to obtain a reasonable power after correction for multiple testing. To obtain the necessary sample sizes, data from different populations/cohorts are combined. The problem of pooling evidence across cohorts bears some resemblance with meta-analysis of clinical trials, and in fact classical meta-analytic methodologies from that field are typically used in GWAs. However, in genetics, it can be expected that the cohorts show some amount of heterogeneity in the association measures that are used for significance testing. In this paper, we demonstrate how it is possible to exploit this heterogeneity to improve our ability to detect influential genetic variants. We also discuss how pathway analysis based on summary data can help resolve heterogeneity. The current standard method for testing SNPs across cohorts in GWAs will miss heterogeneous but important genetic variants affecting complex diseases. Our new testing strategy has the potential to detect them while maintaining sensitivity to variants with homogeneous effects.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 9 (2010)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: https://www.degruyter.com|
|Order Information:||Web: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/sagmb|
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Jelle J. Goeman & Sara A. van de Geer & Hans C. van Houwelingen, 2006. "Testing against a high dimensional alternative," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(3), pages 477-493.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:9:y:2010:i:1:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.