IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/mcmeap/v20y2014i1p1-41n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation and analysis of an adaptive multilevel Monte Carlo algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Hoel Håkon
  • Tempone Raúl

    (Applied Mathematics and Computational Sciences, KAUST, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia)

  • von Schwerin Erik

    (CSQI-MATHICSE, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland)

  • Szepessy Anders

    (Department of Mathematics, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden)

Abstract

We present an adaptive multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) method for weak approximations of solutions to Itô stochastic differential equations (SDE). The work [Oper. Res. 56 (2008), 607–617] proposed and analyzed an MLMC method based on a hierarchy of uniform time discretizations and control variates to reduce the computational effort required by a single level Euler–Maruyama Monte Carlo method from 𝒪( TOL -3)${{{\mathcal {O}}({\mathrm {TOL}}^{-3})}}$ to 𝒪( TOL -2log( TOL -1)2)${{{\mathcal {O}}({\mathrm {TOL}}^{-2}\log ({\mathrm {TOL}}^{-1})^{2})}}$ for a mean square error of 𝒪( TOL 2)${{{\mathcal {O}}({\mathrm {TOL}}^2)}}$. Later, the work [Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng. 82, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2012), 217–234] presented an MLMC method using a hierarchy of adaptively refined, non-uniform time discretizations, and, as such, it may be considered a generalization of the uniform time discretization MLMC method. This work improves the adaptive MLMC algorithms presented in [Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. Eng. 82, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2012), 217–234] and it also provides mathematical analysis of the improved algorithms. In particular, we show that under some assumptions our adaptive MLMC algorithms are asymptotically accurate and essentially have the correct complexity but with improved control of the complexity constant factor in the asymptotic analysis. Numerical tests include one case with singular drift and one with stopped diffusion, where the complexity of a uniform single level method is 𝒪( TOL -4)${{{\mathcal {O}}({\mathrm {TOL}}^{-4})}}$. For both these cases the results confirm the theory, exhibiting savings in the computational cost for achieving the accuracy 𝒪( TOL )${{{\mathcal {O}}({\mathrm {TOL}})}}$ from 𝒪( TOL -3)${{{\mathcal {O}}({\mathrm {TOL}}^{-3})}}$ for the adaptive single level algorithm to essentially 𝒪( TOL -2log( TOL -1)2)${{{\mathcal {O}}({\mathrm {TOL}}^{-2}\log ({\mathrm {TOL}}^{-1})^2)}}$ for the adaptive MLMC algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoel Håkon & Tempone Raúl & von Schwerin Erik & Szepessy Anders, 2014. "Implementation and analysis of an adaptive multilevel Monte Carlo algorithm," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 1-41, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:mcmeap:v:20:y:2014:i:1:p:1-41:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/mcma-2013-0014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/mcma-2013-0014
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/mcma-2013-0014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Giles & Desmond Higham & Xuerong Mao, 2009. "Analysing multi-level Monte Carlo for options with non-globally Lipschitz payoff," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 403-413, September.
    2. Gobet, Emmanuel, 2000. "Weak approximation of killed diffusion using Euler schemes," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 167-197, June.
    3. Michael B. Giles, 2008. "Multilevel Monte Carlo Path Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 607-617, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed Kebaier & J'er^ome Lelong, 2015. "Coupling Importance Sampling and Multilevel Monte Carlo using Sample Average Approximation," Papers 1510.03590, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2017.
    2. Michael B. Giles & Abdul-Lateef Haji-Ali & Jonathan Spence, 2023. "Efficient Risk Estimation for the Credit Valuation Adjustment," Papers 2301.05886, arXiv.org.
    3. Christian Bayer & Chiheb Ben Hammouda & Raul Tempone, 2020. "Multilevel Monte Carlo with Numerical Smoothing for Robust and Efficient Computation of Probabilities and Densities," Papers 2003.05708, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    4. Andrei Cozma & Christoph Reisinger, 2017. "Strong convergence rates for Euler approximations to a class of stochastic path-dependent volatility models," Papers 1706.07375, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2018.
    5. Benjamin Jourdain & Mohamed Sbai, 2013. "High order discretization schemes for stochastic volatility models," Post-Print hal-00409861, HAL.
    6. Andrei Cozma & Christoph Reisinger, 2017. "Strong order 1/2 convergence of full truncation Euler approximations to the Cox-Ingersoll-Ross process," Papers 1704.07321, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2018.
    7. Bayer Christian & Szepessy Anders & Tempone Raúl, 2010. "Adaptive weak approximation of reflected and stopped diffusions," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 1-67, January.
    8. Mike Giles & Lukasz Szpruch, 2012. "Multilevel Monte Carlo methods for applications in finance," Papers 1212.1377, arXiv.org.
    9. Ahmed Kebaier & Jérôme Lelong, 2018. "Coupling Importance Sampling and Multilevel Monte Carlo using Sample Average Approximation," Post-Print hal-01214840, HAL.
    10. Michael B. Giles & Kristian Debrabant & Andreas Ro{ss}ler, 2013. "Analysis of multilevel Monte Carlo path simulation using the Milstein discretisation," Papers 1302.4676, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2019.
    11. Hideyuki Tanaka & Toshihiro Yamada, 2013. "Strong Convergence for Euler-Maruyama and Milstein Schemes with Asymptotic Method (Forthcoming in "International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance")," CARF F-Series CARF-F-333, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo.
    12. Ben Alaya Mohamed & Kebaier Ahmed, 2014. "Multilevel Monte Carlo for Asian options and limit theorems," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 20(3), pages 181-194, September.
    13. Mouna Ben Derouich & Ahmed Kebaier, 2022. "The interpolated drift implicit Euler scheme Multilevel Monte Carlo method for pricing Barrier options and applications to the CIR and CEV models," Papers 2210.00779, arXiv.org.
    14. Dong An & Noah Linden & Jin-Peng Liu & Ashley Montanaro & Changpeng Shao & Jiasu Wang, 2020. "Quantum-accelerated multilevel Monte Carlo methods for stochastic differential equations in mathematical finance," Papers 2012.06283, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    15. Michael B. Giles & Abdul-Lateef Haji-Ali, 2022. "Multilevel Path Branching for Digital Options," Papers 2209.03017, arXiv.org.
    16. Jean-Francois Chassagneux & Antoine Jacquier & Ivo Mihaylov, 2014. "An explicit Euler scheme with strong rate of convergence for financial SDEs with non-Lipschitz coefficients," Papers 1405.3561, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2016.
    17. Ahmed Kebaier & Jérôme Lelong, 2017. "Coupling Importance Sampling and Multilevel Monte Carlo using Sample Average Approximation," Working Papers hal-01214840, HAL.
    18. Fabian Dickmann & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2014. "Faster Comparison of Stopping Times by Nested Conditional Monte Carlo," Papers 1402.0243, arXiv.org.
    19. Yi Chen & Jing Dong & Hao Ni, 2021. "ɛ-Strong Simulation of Fractional Brownian Motion and Related Stochastic Differential Equations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 559-594, May.
    20. Jian Wang & Xiang Gao & Zhili Sun, 2021. "A Multilevel Simulation Method for Time-Variant Reliability Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:mcmeap:v:20:y:2014:i:1:p:1-41:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.