IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/lawdev/v5y2012i1n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Legal Cultural Analysis of Microtrade

Author

Listed:
  • Picker Colin B.

    (University of New South Wales)

Abstract

As a new international economic policy, microtrade will face a whole host of issues, including potential legal cultural obstacles. Those legal cultural issues will arise as a result of the different and sometimes conflicting legal cultures of the varied participants within the different fora and communities involved in microtrade from the LDCs to the NGOs to the artisans within the exporting entities. This paper identifies many of the legal cultural issues involved in microtrade, with such identification ideally then permitting the amelioration of the negative impact on microtrade of those legal cultural issues. Many legal cultural issues will be explored, including the legal cultures associated with rural communities, women, international trade law, the microtrade organization, and the legal culture associated with small entities.

Suggested Citation

  • Picker Colin B., 2012. "A Legal Cultural Analysis of Microtrade," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 101-128, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:5:y:2012:i:1:n:6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ldr.2012.5.issue-1/1943-3867.1152/1943-3867.1152.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Brummer, 2010. "Why Soft Law Dominates International Finance--and not Trade," Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 623-643, September.
    2. Picker Colin, 2011. "International Trade and Development Law: A Legal Cultural Critique," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 4(2), pages 43-71, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:5:y:2012:i:1:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.