IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jeehcn/v11y2001i2n10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Frédéric Bastiat as an Austrian Economist

Author

Listed:
  • Thornton Mark

    (Columbus State University)

Abstract

Bastiat is widely acknowledged as the most effective advocate of free markets, but his status as an economist is widely denied even by prominent Austrian economists who share his literary style and support for liberty. In particular, his theories of value and exchange have been attacked as a labor theory of value. Bastiat is exonerated here from these charges and is shown to fully oppose objective theories of value and to fully endorse the gains from free exchange. In addition, Bastiat viewed economics as a science based on deductive reasoning and he vehemently opposed the use of mathematics. He thus was an important precursor of the Austrian school of economics.Bastiat est très reconnu comme étant le défenseur le plus éloquent du libre marché. Cependant, son statut en tant qu'économiste est amplement nié, et ce, même par les économistes Autrichiens éminents qui sont en accord avec son style littéraire et sa défense de la liberté. En particulier, ses théories de la valeur et de l'échange, considérées comme participant de la théorie de la valeur-travail, ont fait l'objet de critiques. Cet article exonère Bastiat de ces critiques et démontre que ses théories s'opposent radicalement aux théories objectives de la valeur : Bastiat avait une compréhension parfaite des gains découlant des échanges libres. De plus, Bastiat envisageait l'économie comme une science reposant sur un raisonnement déductif et s'opposait résolument à l'emploi des mathématiques. En ce sens, il était un précurseur important de l'école Autrichienne d'économie.

Suggested Citation

  • Thornton Mark, 2001. "Frédéric Bastiat as an Austrian Economist," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jeehcn:v:11:y:2001:i:2:n:10
    DOI: 10.2202/1145-6396.1025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1145-6396.1025
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1145-6396.1025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goodwin, Craufurd D W, 1972. "Economic Theory and Society: A Plea for Process Analysis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(2), pages 409-415, May.
    2. Frank H. Knight, 1967. "Laissez Faire: Pro and Con," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 75(6), pages 782-782.
    3. Lowell Gallaway & Richard Vedder, 1989. "The Tullock-Bastiat hypothesis and Rawlsian distribution strategies," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 177-181, May.
    4. Thornton Mark, 1998. "Richard Cantillon and the Origin of Economic Theory," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-14, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bramoullé Gérard, 2001. "Frédéric Bastiat: Praxeologist Theoretician," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aliye Ahu Gülümser & Tüzın Baycan-Levent & Peter Nijkamp, 2009. "Measuring Regional Creative Capacity: A Literature Review for Rural-Specific Approaches," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 545-563, October.
    2. Timarán Rivera, Ana Patricia & Ortega Enríquez, Ramón & Ascuntar Rivera, María Cristina, 2022. "El emprendimiento cultural y su relación con los nuevos escenarios económicos y sociales," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 23(2), pages 220-245, July.
    3. Francesco Cattabrini & Fabio Masini, 2017. "Balance of Payment, Wage Indexation and Growth: the Role of CESPE in Italian Policy-Making in the 1970s," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(2), pages 25-48.
    4. Hülsmann Jörg Guido, 2001. "More on Cantillon as a Proto-Austrian," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Lazebnik, Teddy, 2023. "Computational applications of extended SIR models: A review focused on airborne pandemics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 483(C).
    6. Andrew Farrant & Edward McPhail, 2012. "Supporters Are Wrong," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 94-105.
    7. Denis O’Brien, 2014. "Hayek in the history of economic thought," Chapters, in: Roger W. Garrison & Norman Barry (ed.), Elgar Companion to Hayekian Economics, chapter 2, pages 11-46, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Ross B. Emmett, 2020. "James M. Buchanan and Frank H. Knight on democracy as “government by discussion”," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 183(3), pages 303-314, June.
    9. Stephen P. Barrows, 2010. "The Law of Population and the Austrian School," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(4), pages 1178-1205, October.
    10. Andrea Salanti, 1994. "On the Lakatosian apple of discord in the history and methodology of economics," Finnish Economic Papers, Finnish Economic Association, vol. 7(1), pages 30-41, Spring.
    11. Milan Zafirovski, 2024. "Distributive justice revisited in a comparative setting: the fairness of wages in OECD countries and modalities of society," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-44, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jeehcn:v:11:y:2001:i:2:n:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.