IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/bjafio/v23y2025i1p65-72n1006.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Theoretical Assessment of Informal Agricultural Cooperation Under Distrust: Implications from a Network Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • May Daniel E.

    (Harper Business School, Harper Adams University, Shrewsbury Road, Newport, Shropshire, TF10 8NB, UK)

  • Soza-Amigo Sergio

    (Instituto de Gestión e Industria, 28040 Universidad Austral de Chile , Puerto Montt, Chile)

  • Tremma Ourania

    (Department of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland)

Abstract

A common form of cooperation in rural areas corresponds to informal alliances in which farmers save productive costs, for example, by sharing inputs, machinery, and information. By reducing costs cooperatively, these alliances contribute to agricultural land management by increasing efficiency. Despite the benefits, these alliances are typically formed by a small number of farmers. Some researchers attribute this lack of participation to distrust. To model this type of cooperation, this article extends the traditional Network of Collaboration approach which has traditionally been developed in an oligopolistic context. While oligopoly is a type of market structure that can exists in agriculture, most of the farmers who participate in informal cooperation are small enterprises suggesting that the price-taking assumption is a more realistic description for these farmers. We use this market structure extension to show that profit-maximising farmers consider the positive impact of cost reduction; the negative impact of distrust; and the expected gain in output when joining new informal alliances. As such, recommendations are provided to integrate these three factors to facilitate the formation of beneficial informal network alliances in the rural landscape and their positive externality in agricultural land management.

Suggested Citation

  • May Daniel E. & Soza-Amigo Sergio & Tremma Ourania, 2025. "A Theoretical Assessment of Informal Agricultural Cooperation Under Distrust: Implications from a Network Perspective," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 23(1), pages 65-72.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:bjafio:v:23:y:2025:i:1:p:65-72:n:1006
    DOI: 10.1515/jafio-2025-0004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jafio-2025-0004
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jafio-2025-0004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    informal alliances; cost saving; distrust; farm management efficiency; agricultural land management;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness
    • R14 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Land Use Patterns

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bjafio:v:23:y:2025:i:1:p:65-72:n:1006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.