IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/scjsta/v43y2016i3p721-735.html

Empirical Likelihood Inference for the Rao-Hartley-Cochran Sampling Design

Author

Listed:
  • Yves G. Berger

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Yves G. Berger, 2016. "Empirical Likelihood Inference for the Rao-Hartley-Cochran Sampling Design," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 43(3), pages 721-735, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:43:y:2016:i:3:p:721-735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/sjos.12200
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Chen, 2002. "Using empirical likelihood methods to obtain range restricted weights in regression estimators for surveys," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(1), pages 230-237, March.
    2. Sanjay Chaudhuri & Mark S. Handcock & Michael S. Rendall, 2008. "Generalized linear models incorporating population level information: an empirical‐likelihood‐based approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(2), pages 311-328, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denis Devaud & Yves Tillé, 2019. "Deville and Särndal’s calibration: revisiting a 25-years-old successful optimization problem," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(4), pages 1033-1065, December.
    2. Oǧuz-Alper, Melike & Berger, Yves G., 2020. "Modelling multilevel data under complex sampling designs: An empirical likelihood approach," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    3. Y. G. Berger & O. De La Riva Torres, 2016. "Empirical likelihood confidence intervals for complex sampling designs," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(2), pages 319-341, March.
    4. Yves G. Berger & Ewa Kabzińska, 2020. "Empirical Likelihood Approach for Aligning Information from Multiple Surveys," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(1), pages 54-74, April.
    5. Lv, Yang & Qin, Guoyou & Zhu, Zhongyi, 2024. "Population-level information for improving quantile regression efficiency," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Peisong Han & Linglong Kong & Jiwei Zhao & Xingcai Zhou, 2019. "A general framework for quantile estimation with incomplete data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 81(2), pages 305-333, April.
    7. Igari, Ryosuke & Hoshino, Takahiro, 2018. "A Bayesian data combination approach for repeated durations under unobserved missing indicators: Application to interpurchase-timing in marketing," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 150-166.
    8. Liu, Tianqing & Yuan, Xiaohui, 2012. "Combining quasi and empirical likelihoods in generalized linear models with missing responses," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 39-58.
    9. Sanjay Chaudhuri & Malay Ghosh, 2011. "Empirical likelihood for small area estimation," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 98(2), pages 473-480.
    10. Han Zhang & Lu Deng & William Wheeler & Jing Qin & Kai Yu, 2022. "Integrative analysis of multiple case‐control studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 1080-1091, September.
    11. Sanjay Chaudhuri & Debashis Mondal & Teng Yin, 2017. "Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling in Bayesian empirical likelihood computation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(1), pages 293-320, January.
    12. Variyath A. M., 2013. "Empirical Likelihood Based Control Charts," Stochastics and Quality Control, De Gruyter, vol. 28(1), pages 37-44, October.
    13. Ying Sheng & Yifei Sun & Chiung‐Yu Huang & Mi‐Ok Kim, 2022. "Synthesizing external aggregated information in the presence of population heterogeneity: A penalized empirical likelihood approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 679-690, June.
    14. Jing Lv & Chaohui Guo & Jibo Wu, 2019. "Smoothed empirical likelihood inference via the modified Cholesky decomposition for quantile varying coefficient models with longitudinal data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 999-1032, September.
    15. Xiaogang Duan & Guosheng Yin, 2017. "Ensemble Approaches to Estimating the Population Mean with Missing Response," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(4), pages 899-917, December.
    16. Tang, Cheng Yong & Leng, Chenlei, 2012. "An empirical likelihood approach to quantile regression with auxiliary information," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 29-36.
    17. Jae Kwang Kim & Mingue Park, 2010. "Calibration Estimation in Survey Sampling," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 78(1), pages 21-39, April.
    18. Changbao Wu & Wilson W. Lu, 2016. "Calibration Weighting Methods for Complex Surveys," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 79-98, April.
    19. Berger, Yves G. & Patilea, Valentin, 2022. "A semi-parametric empirical likelihood approach for conditional estimating equations under endogenous selection," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 151-163.
    20. Yuan, Xiaohui & Liu, Tianqing & Lin, Nan & Zhang, Baoxue, 2010. "Combining conditional and unconditional moment restrictions with missing responses," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(10), pages 2420-2433, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:scjsta:v:43:y:2016:i:3:p:721-735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6898 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.