IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v35y2018i4p642-666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Technology Centers as Intermediary Organizations Facilitating Links for Innovation: Four Cases of Federal Technology Centers in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Federico Stezano

Abstract

This article presents a review of the discussion and debate around the intermediation functions carried out by technology centers (TCs), considered key organizations in the dynamics of national innovation processes based on collaboration between actors. I discuss the organizational roles and R&D strategies assumed by four Mexican TCs within the Mexican National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) in order to encourage productive cooperation based on technology transfer and knowledge transfer. Grounded on this empirical referent, the present study analyzes critical structural factors in terms of organizational governance schemes, connections with regional innovation dynamics, and the national science‐industry cooperation strategies behind the configuration of the analyzed TCs, which have determined their organizational action profiles. 技术中心作为中介机构促进创新联系：墨西哥联邦技术中心的四个案例 本文回顾了针对技术中心的调解职能的讨论和辩论。在国家创新进程动态, 技术中心是基于参与者之间协作的关键组织。笔者讨论萨尔瓦多国家科学技术委员会 (CONACYT) 的四家技术中心所承担的组织角色与研发策略, 来鼓励基于技术转移和知识转移的生产合作。以该技术中心为实践参照, 通过研究其背后所展示的组织管理方案、与区域性创新动力的联系以及国家科学产业合作战略, 本文分析了决定其组织行动的关键结构性因素。 El papel de los centros de desarrollo tecnológico como organizaciones intermediarias que facilitan los vínculos para la innovación: cuatro casos de centros federales de desarrollo tecnológico en México Este documento presenta una reseña de la discusión y debate acerca de las funciones intermediarias que llevan a cabo los centros de desarrollo tecnológico (TCs), que son considerados como organizaciones clave para la dinámica de los procesos de innovación basados en la colaboración entre las partes. Discutimos el papel organizacional de las estrategias de investigación y desarrollo asumidas por cuatro TCs mexicanos dentro del Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) para fomentar la cooperación productiva basada en la transferencia de tecnológica y conocimiento. Basándose en este referente empírico, el presente estudio analiza los factores estructurales en términos de los esquemas de gobernanza organizaciones, conexiones con las dinámicas de innovación regionales y las estrategias de cooperación nacionales entre la ciencia y la industria detrás de la configuración de los TCs que fueron analizados, que han determinado sus perfiles de acción organizacional.

Suggested Citation

  • Federico Stezano, 2018. "The Role of Technology Centers as Intermediary Organizations Facilitating Links for Innovation: Four Cases of Federal Technology Centers in Mexico," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 35(4), pages 642-666, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:35:y:2018:i:4:p:642-666
    DOI: 10.1111/ropr.12293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12293
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ropr.12293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thorsten Roser & Ksenija Kuzmina & Mikko Koria, 2023. "Enabling Sustainable Adaptation and Transitions: Exploring New Roles of a Tourism Innovation Intermediary in Andalusia, Spain," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Astrid Jaime & Constanza Pérez‐Martelo & Bernardo Herrera & Gonzalo Ordóñez‐Matamoros & Dominique Vinck, 2023. "Functioning strategies of the research groups' leaders in the context of funding and policy instabilities," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(2), pages 282-306, March.
    3. Daniel Feser, 2023. "Innovation intermediaries revised: a systematic literature review on innovation intermediaries’ role for knowledge sharing," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1827-1862, July.
    4. de Almeida, Liliane & Augusto de Jesus Pacheco, Diego & Caten, Carla Schwengber ten & Jung, Carlos Fernando, 2021. "A methodology for identifying results and impacts in technological innovation projects," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    5. Bertha Vallejo & Banji Oyelaran-Oyeyinka & Nicholas Ozor & Maurice Bolo, 2019. "Open Innovation and Innovation Intermediaries in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:35:y:2018:i:4:p:642-666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.