IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/revpol/v2y1983i4p631-647.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Evaluation And Program Termination

Author

Listed:
  • Peter DeLeon

Abstract

One example of treating the policy process as an integrated process is the relationship between policy evaluation and policy termination. Policy and program terminations are seen as having three rationales: cost reductions, programmatic inefficiencies, and political ideology. The third appears to be the most important. Even so, formal program evaluation is increasingly critical to the termination exercise. This has important policy implications for both the professional evaluation community and those who have program termination responsibilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter DeLeon, 1983. "Policy Evaluation And Program Termination," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 2(4), pages 631-647, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:2:y:1983:i:4:p:631-647
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1983.tb00793.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1983.tb00793.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1983.tb00793.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ron SPIEGEL, 2014. "Organizational Changes within a Governmental Agency As It Becomes an Authority - Transition from Israel Land Administration to Israel Land Authority (Part 1)," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(1), pages 78-87, March.
    2. Sojin Jang & Hongtao Yi, 2022. "Organized elite power and clean energy: A study of negative policy experimentations with renewable portfolio standards," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(1), pages 8-31, January.
    3. Lauren Richie & J. Oppenheimer & Susan Clark, 2012. "Social process in grizzly bear management: lessons for collaborative governance and natural resource policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(3), pages 265-291, September.
    4. Meeyoung Lamothe & Scott Lamothe, 2015. "Exploring the Determinants of Local Service Termination," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1453-1474, November.
    5. Christopher M. Weible, 2020. "IN MEMORIUM—Peter DeLeon (1943–2020) “Standing on the Shoulders of a Giant: The Sagacity of Peter deLeon’s Policy Sciences”," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(3), pages 389-394, September.
    6. Araz Taeihagh & M Ramesh & Michael Howlett, 2021. "Assessing the regulatory challenges of emerging disruptive technologies," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1009-1019, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:revpol:v:2:y:1983:i:4:p:631-647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipsonea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.