IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/reviec/v27y2019i3p786-802.html

Somatic distance, trust and trade

Author

Listed:
  • Jacques Melitz
  • Farid Toubal

Abstract

Somatic distance, or differences in physical appearance, proves to be extremely important in the gravity model of bilateral trade in conformity with results in other areas of economics and outside in the social sciences. This is also true independently of survey evidence about bilateral trust. These findings are obtained in a sample of the 15 members of the European Economic Area in 1996. Robustness tests also show that somatic distance, as well as co‐ancestry, has a more reliable influence on bilateral trade than the other customary cultural variables. The article finally discusses the interpretation and breadth of application of these results.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacques Melitz & Farid Toubal, 2019. "Somatic distance, trust and trade," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 786-802, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:27:y:2019:i:3:p:786-802
    DOI: 10.1111/roie.12397
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12397
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/roie.12397?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gideon Onyewuchi Ndubuisi, 2020. "Contractual frictions and the patterns of trade: The role of generalized trust," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(7), pages 775-796, October.
    2. Olivier BARGAIN & Jean-Marie CARDEBAT & Raphaël CHIAPPINI, 2020. "Trade Uncorked: Genetic Resistance and Quality Heterogeneity in Wine Exports," Bordeaux Economics Working Papers 2020-18, Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE).
    3. José De Sousa & Amélie Guillin & Julie Lochard & Arthur Silve, 2020. "Trust and Specialization: Evidence from U.S. States," Cahiers de recherche 2010, Centre de recherche sur les risques, les enjeux économiques, et les politiques publiques.
    4. Carlos Abreo & Ricardo Bustillo & Carlos Rodriguez, 2022. "An empirical analysis of Colombia's trade liberalization process and its effect on the equilibrium of its structural trade deficit," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 736-755, May.
    5. Benedikt Heid & Wenxi Lu, 2022. "Genetic distance, cultural differences, and the formation of regional trade agreements," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 158(1), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Matteo Fiorini & Giorgia Giovannetti & Mauro Lanati & Filippo Santi, 2021. "Asymmetric cultural proximity and greenfield foreign direct investment," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(9), pages 2572-2603, September.
    7. Chakraborty, Suparna & Wang, Miao Grace & Wong, M. C. Sunny, 2024. "Coupling and decoupling of ancestral linkages and current cross-border economic activities: Genetics and policy," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    8. Ndubuisi, Gideon & Konte, Maty, 2019. "Credit constraints and trade performance: Does trust-based social capital matter?," MERIT Working Papers 2019-046, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F40 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - General
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:reviec:v:27:y:2019:i:3:p:786-802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0965-7576 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.