IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/rdevec/v6y2002i2p151-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Democracy and Development: Cruel Dilemma or Symbiotic Relationship?

Author

Listed:
  • Jagdish N. Bhagwati

Abstract

The paper dissects the hypothesis that democracy is inimical to economic development. The historical origin of this perspective is presented and its key theoretical and empirical assumptions are examined and assessed. The chief conclusion is that there is no necessary tradeoff between democracy and development. When compared to authoritarian regimes, democracy is more likely to foster an environment that facilitates the innovative and entrepreneurial process so essential for sustained development. On the other hand, democracy is better for development only when accompanied by an expansion of markets and competition. Democracy without markets is unlikely to deliver significant growth. In this context, liberalized international trade can act in a productive symbiosis with democratic institutions to promote development by facilitating bilateral flows of ideas, knowledge, goods, services, and technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Jagdish N. Bhagwati, 2002. "Democracy and Development: Cruel Dilemma or Symbiotic Relationship?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(2), pages 151-162, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:6:y:2002:i:2:p:151-162
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9361.00147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9361.00147
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9361.00147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Serikbayeva, Balzhan & Abdulla, Kanat & Oskenbayev, Yessengali, 2020. "State capacity in responding to COVID-19," MPRA Paper 101511, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mireille Razafindrakoto & François Roubaud, 2005. "Les pauvres, la démocratie et le marché : une analyse à partir de trois séries d'enquêtes auprès de la population malgache," Revue d’économie du développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 13(1), pages 53-89.
    3. Gonçalves Junior, Oswaldo & Braga Martes, Ana Cristina, 2015. "Democracy, markets and rural development: The case of small goat-milk farmers in the Brazilian northeast," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 16(3), pages 25-33.
    4. Jac C. Heckelman, 2010. "The Connection between Democratic Freedoms and Growth in Transition Economies," Applied Economics Quarterly (formerly: Konjunkturpolitik), Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 56(2), pages 121-146.
    5. Oluwole Owoye & Olugbenga A. Onafowora, 2018. "The Role Of Educated Leaders In Economic Growth And Development: Evidence From Central African Republic And Singapore," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 65(01), pages 81-102, November.
    6. Kanybek Nur-tegin, 2014. "Entrenched Autocracy or New Democracy: Which Is Better for Business?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 398-419, August.
    7. Jessica Henson Decker & Jamus Jerome Lim, 2008. "What fundamentally drives growth? Revisiting the institutions and economic performance debate," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(5), pages 698-725.
    8. Asiye TÜTÜNCÜ, 2020. "The Effect of Democracy on Economic Growth in Developing Countries," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 28(44).
    9. Shakeel Qadir & Muhammad Tariq & Muhammad Waqas, 2016. "Democracy Or Military Dictatorship: A Choice Of Governance For The Economic Growth Of Pakistan," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 12(1), pages 39-51.
    10. Younes Boujelbene & Nedra Baklouti, 2021. "The Causal Probabilistic Relationship Between Economic Development and Democracy: Evidence from Bayesian Networks Analysis," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 1, pages 27-42, March.
    11. Khurram Jamali & Kirsten Wandschneider & Phanindra Wunnava, 2007. "The effect of political regimes and technology on economic growth," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(11), pages 1425-1432.
    12. M. Adnan Kabir & Najib Alam, 2021. "The Efficacy of Democracy and Freedom in Fostering Economic Growth," Emerging Economy Studies, International Management Institute, vol. 7(1), pages 76-93, May.
    13. Paudel, Jayash & de Araujo, Pedro, 2017. "Demographic responses to a political transformation: Evidence of women’s empowerment from Nepal," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 325-343.
    14. Tang, Sam Hak Kan & Yung, Linda Chor Wing, 2008. "Does rapid economic growth enhance democratization? Time-series evidence from high performing Asian economies," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 244-253, June.
    15. Dereje Alemayehu, 2022. "Challenges to The Assumption That Economic Success Could Enhance State Legitimacy in Africa, Ten Years Later," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 65(2), pages 161-177, December.
    16. Muhammad Ashraf & Nawaz Ahmad & Sheema Haider3, 2016. "Antecedents Of Turnover Intentions: A Study Of Karachi Business Schools," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 12(2), pages 12-10.
    17. Robert Neumann & Peter Graeff, 2010. "A Multitrait-Multimethod approach to pinpoint the validity of aggregated governance indicators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 849-864, August.
    18. Benno Torgler, 2021. "Symbiotics > Economics?," CREMA Working Paper Series 2021-15, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    19. Rui Tang & Shiping Tang, 2018. "Democracy's Unique Advantage in Promoting Economic Growth: Quantitative Evidence for a New Institutional Theory," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(4), pages 642-666, November.
    20. Eduardo Sanz-Arcega, 2013. "The Nonexistence of the cruel dilemma or the unlikely prosperity of the economic system of freedom in the absence of it," Documentos de Trabajo (DT-AEHE) 1308, Asociación Española de Historia Económica.
    21. Narayan, Paresh Kumar & Smyth, Russell, 2006. "Democracy and Economic Growth in China: Evidence from Cointegration and Causality Testing," Review of Applied Economics, Lincoln University, Department of Financial and Business Systems, vol. 2(1), pages 1-18.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:6:y:2002:i:2:p:151-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1363-6669 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.