IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/pbudge/v35y2015i4p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Practical Imagination: A Possible Future for Federal Budgeting

Author

Listed:
  • F. Stevens Redburn

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • F. Stevens Redburn, 2015. "Practical Imagination: A Possible Future for Federal Budgeting," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:pbudge:v:35:y:2015:i:4:p:1-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/pbaf.12085
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip G. Joyce, 2008. "Does more (or even better) information lead to better budgeting? A new perspective," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 945-960.
    2. Michael Keenan & Paul Cutler & John Marks & Richard Meylan & Carthage Smith & Emilia Koivisto, 2012. "Orienting international science cooperation to meet global 'grand challenges'," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(2), pages 166-177, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. F. Stevens Redburn, 2021. "Budgeting for existential crisis: The federal government as society's guarantor," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 5-21, September.
    2. Roy T. Meyers, 2017. "Is the U.S. Congress an Insurmountable Obstacle to Any “Far-Sighted Conception of Budgeting”?," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 5-24, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roy T. Meyers, 2017. "Is the U.S. Congress an Insurmountable Obstacle to Any “Far-Sighted Conception of Budgeting”?," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 5-24, December.
    2. Leonid Gokhberg & Ilya Kuzminov & Pavel Bakhtin & Elena Tochilina & Alexander Chulok & Anton Timofeev & Alina Lavrinenko, 2017. "Big-Data-Augmented Approach to Emerging Technologies Identification: Case of Agriculture and Food Sector," HSE Working papers WP BRP 76/STI/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Anna‐Maria Hubert, 2021. "A Code of Conduct for Responsible Geoengineering Research," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S1), pages 82-96, April.
    4. Alfred Tat-Kei Ho, 2010. "Budget Reforms in the United States: A ‘Perfect Storm' for a New Wave of Deficit-Reduction Reforms," Chapters, in: John Wanna & Lotte Jensen & Jouke de Vries (ed.), The Reality of Budgetary Reform in OECD Nations, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Stephen Brammer & Layla Branicki & Martina Linnenluecke & Tom Smith, 2019. "Grand challenges in management research: Attributes, achievements, and advancement," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(4), pages 517-533, November.
    6. Charlotte Rungius & Tim Flink, 2020. "Romancing science for global solutions: on narratives and interpretative schemas of science diplomacy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Ringa Raudla & Riin Savi, 2015. "The use of performance information in cutback budgeting," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 409-416, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:pbudge:v:35:y:2015:i:4:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0275-1100 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.