IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssc/v70y2021i2p372-397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiscale null hypothesis testing for network‐valued data: Analysis of brain networks of patients with autism

Author

Listed:
  • Ilenia Lovato
  • Alessia Pini
  • Aymeric Stamm
  • Maxime Taquet
  • Simone Vantini

Abstract

Networks are a natural way of representing the human brain for studying its structure and function and, as such, have been extensively used. In this framework, case–control studies for understanding autism pertain to comparing samples of healthy and autistic brain networks. In order to understand the biological mechanisms involved in the pathology, it is key to localize the differences on the brain network. Motivated by this question, we hereby propose a general non‐parametric finite‐sample exact statistical framework that allows to test for differences in connectivity within and between prespecified areas inside the brain network, with strong control of the family‐wise error rate. We demonstrate unprecedented ability to differentiate children with non‐syndromic autism from children with both autism and tuberous sclerosis complex using electroencephalography data. The implementation of the method is available in the R package nevada.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilenia Lovato & Alessia Pini & Aymeric Stamm & Maxime Taquet & Simone Vantini, 2021. "Multiscale null hypothesis testing for network‐valued data: Analysis of brain networks of patients with autism," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(2), pages 372-397, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:70:y:2021:i:2:p:372-397
    DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12463
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rssc.12463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lovato, Ilenia & Pini, Alessia & Stamm, Aymeric & Vantini, Simone, 2020. "Model-free two-sample test for network-valued data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Phipson Belinda & Smyth Gordon K, 2010. "Permutation P-values Should Never Be Zero: Calculating Exact P-values When Permutations Are Randomly Drawn," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Daniele Durante & David B. Dunson & Joshua T. Vogelstein, 2017. "Rejoinder: Nonparametric Bayes Modeling of Populations of Networks," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(520), pages 1547-1552, October.
    4. Aswin Sekar & Allison R. Bialas & Heather de Rivera & Avery Davis & Timothy R. Hammond & Nolan Kamitaki & Katherine Tooley & Jessy Presumey & Matthew Baum & Vanessa Van Doren & Giulio Genovese & Samue, 2016. "Schizophrenia risk from complex variation of complement component 4," Nature, Nature, vol. 530(7589), pages 177-183, February.
    5. Daniele Durante & David B. Dunson & Joshua T. Vogelstein, 2017. "Nonparametric Bayes Modeling of Populations of Networks," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(520), pages 1516-1530, October.
    6. Osborne, Daniel & Patrangenaru, Vic & Ellingson, Leif & Groisser, David & Schwartzman, Armin, 2013. "Nonparametric two-sample tests on homogeneous Riemannian manifolds, Cholesky decompositions and Diffusion Tensor Image analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 163-175.
    7. Westfall, Peter H. & Tobias, Randall D., 2007. "Multiple Testing of General Contrasts: Truncated Closure and the Extended ShafferRoyen Method," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 102, pages 487-494, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lovato, Ilenia & Pini, Alessia & Stamm, Aymeric & Vantini, Simone, 2020. "Model-free two-sample test for network-valued data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    2. Laleh Tafakori & Armin Pourkhanali & Riccardo Rastelli, 2022. "Measuring systemic risk and contagion in the European financial network," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 345-389, July.
    3. Chung, Jaewon & Bridgeford, Eric & Arroyo, Jesus & Pedigo, Benjamin D. & Saad-Eldin, Ali & Gopalakrishnan, Vivek & Xiang, Liang & Priebe, Carey E. & Vogelstein, Joshua T., 2020. "Statistical Connectomics," OSF Preprints ek4n3, Center for Open Science.
    4. Linardi, Fernando & Diks, Cees & van der Leij, Marco & Lazier, Iuri, 2020. "Dynamic interbank network analysis using latent space models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Silvia D'Angelo & Marco Alfò & Thomas Brendan Murphy, 2020. "Modeling node heterogeneity in latent space models for multidimensional networks," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 74(3), pages 324-341, August.
    6. Masha Shunko & Julie Niederhoff & Yaroslav Rosokha, 2018. "Humans Are Not Machines: The Behavioral Impact of Queueing Design on Service Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 453-473, January.
    7. Alessandro, Martin & Cardinale Lagomarsino, Bruno & Scartascini, Carlos & Streb, Jorge & Torrealday, Jerónimo, 2021. "Transparency and Trust in Government. Evidence from a Survey Experiment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Brice Ozenne & Esben Budtz-Jørgensen & Sebastian Elgaard Ebert, 2023. "Controlling the familywise error rate when performing multiple comparisons in a linear latent variable model," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Romero, Julian & Rosokha, Yaroslav, 2018. "Constructing strategies in the indefinitely repeated prisoner’s dilemma game," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 185-219.
    10. Silke Janitza & Ender Celik & Anne-Laure Boulesteix, 2018. "A computationally fast variable importance test for random forests for high-dimensional data," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 12(4), pages 885-915, December.
    11. Mary-Ellen Lynall & Blagoje Soskic & James Hayhurst & Jeremy Schwartzentruber & Daniel F. Levey & Gita A. Pathak & Renato Polimanti & Joel Gelernter & Murray B. Stein & Gosia Trynka & Menna R. Clatwor, 2022. "Genetic variants associated with psychiatric disorders are enriched at epigenetically active sites in lymphoid cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Paul Blanche & Jean‐François Dartigues & Jérémie Riou, 2022. "A closed max‐t test for multiple comparisons of areas under the ROC curve," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 352-363, March.
    13. Angela L. Riffo-Campos & Guillermo Ayala & Juan Domingo, 2021. "Ordering of Omics Features Using Beta Distributions on Montecarlo p -Values," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, June.
    14. Benoit Ahanda & Daniel E. Osborne & Leif Ellingson, 2022. "Robustness of lognormal confidence regions for means of symmetric positive definite matrices when applied to mixtures of lognormal distributions," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 80(3), pages 281-303, December.
    15. Jessica Gracias & Funda Orhan & Elin Hörbeck & Jessica Holmén-Larsson & Neda Khanlarkani & Susmita Malwade & Sravan K. Goparaju & Lilly Schwieler & İlknur Ş. Demirel & Ting Fu & Helena Fatourus-Bergma, 2022. "Cerebrospinal fluid concentration of complement component 4A is increased in first episode schizophrenia," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Baddeley, Adrian & Hardegen, Andrew & Lawrence, Thomas & Milne, Robin K. & Nair, Gopalan & Rakshit, Suman, 2017. "On two-stage Monte Carlo tests of composite hypotheses," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 75-87.
    17. Aleksandr Talishinsky & Jonathan Downar & Petra E. Vértes & Jakob Seidlitz & Katharine Dunlop & Charles J. Lynch & Heather Whalley & Andrew McIntosh & Fidel Vila-Rodriguez & Zafiris J. Daskalakis & Da, 2022. "Regional gene expression signatures are associated with sex-specific functional connectivity changes in depression," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Meijer Rosa J. & Krebs Thijmen J.P. & Goeman Jelle J., 2015. "A region-based multiple testing method for hypotheses ordered in space or time," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Jesse Hemerik & Jelle J. Goeman, 2021. "Another Look at the Lady Tasting Tea and Differences Between Permutation Tests and Randomisation Tests," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(2), pages 367-381, August.
    20. Fabian J.E. Telschow & Michael R. Pierrynowski & Stephan F. Huckemann, 2021. "Functional inference on rotational curves under sample‐specific group actions and identification of human gait," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1256-1276, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssc:v:70:y:2021:i:2:p:372-397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.