IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jorssa/v152y1989i1p1-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Population Registers: Some Administrative and Statistical Pros and Cons

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Redfern

Abstract

The Registrar General of 70 years ago recommended that a central population register should co‐ordinate a variety of administrative records of persons. The aims would be to identify each person accurately and so ensure that obligations and rights were correctly assigned to citizens, and to provide better statistics. His vision has become a reality in the Nordic countries and to a major degree in the Benelux coutries too. All have regular and reliable population statistics and in the Nordic countries the censuses of population are based in whole or in part on data from registers. Meanwhile in the UK records of persons remain unco‐ordinated and ramshackle. The Community Charge registers to be created in Britain serve a single purpose and have serious flaws in their design. The climate in the UK is at present hostile to the introduction of an effective multipurpose register on Nordic lines. The paper discusses the pros and cons of such a register which raise issues concerning justice, fairness, freedom, privacy, efficiency, the fight against crime and fraud, and relations between the government and the community.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Redfern, 1989. "Population Registers: Some Administrative and Statistical Pros and Cons," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 152(1), pages 1-28, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:152:y:1989:i:1:p:1-28
    DOI: 10.2307/2982819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2982819
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2307/2982819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philip Redfern, 2004. "An alternative view of the 2001 census and future census taking," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 167(2), pages 209-228, May.
    2. D. H. Judson, 2007. "Information integration for constructing social statistics: history, theory and ideas towards a research programme," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(2), pages 483-501, March.
    3. D. J. Martin, 2007. "Editorial: Census present and future," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(2), pages 263-266, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jorssa:v:152:y:1989:i:1:p:1-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rssssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.