IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v55y2018i4p583-618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta†Analysis of Coefficient Alpha: A Reliability Generalization Study

Author

Listed:
  • Lindsey M. Greco
  • Ernest H. O'Boyle
  • Bethany S. Cockburn
  • Zhenyu Yuan

Abstract

Increasing precision of measurement is a goal of scientific advancement, but Nunnally's (1978) .70 benchmark for coefficient alpha (alpha) has remained the omnibus test for reliability for nearly 40 years. This likely arises due to there only being scattered empirical evidence of the degree to which the field has met or surpassed this standard. Using meta†analytic techniques known as reliability generalization (RG), we cumulate alphas across 36 commonly used individual differences, attitudes, and behaviours from 1675 independent samples (N = 991,588). Our primary finding is that alphas almost always exceed .70 and generally fall above .80. In addition, we identified factors that moderate alpha including the specific measure used, the number of scale items, and the rater. The study provides baseline alphas that can be used for research planning and design; it also offers best practices for RG and notes the benefits of RG for understanding systematic fluctuations in reliability.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindsey M. Greco & Ernest H. O'Boyle & Bethany S. Cockburn & Zhenyu Yuan, 2018. "Meta†Analysis of Coefficient Alpha: A Reliability Generalization Study," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 583-618, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:55:y:2018:i:4:p:583-618
    DOI: 10.1111/joms.12328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12328
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joms.12328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mackey, Jeremy D. & Parker Ellen, B. & McAllister, Charn P. & Alexander, Katherine C., 2021. "The dark side of leadership: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of destructive leadership research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 705-718.
    2. Ellen, B. Parker & Mackey, Jeremy D. & McAllister, Charn P. & Mercer, Ian S., 2022. "Are small measures big problems? A meta-analytic investigation of brief measures of the Big Five," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 579-592.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:55:y:2018:i:4:p:583-618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.