IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jomstd/v39y2002i8p1045-1069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing Discursive Tension: the Co–Existence of Individualist and Collaborative Discourses in Flight Centre

Author

Listed:
  • Ian Palmer
  • Richard Dunford

Abstract

Our study of the travel agency Flight Centre began as a case study of a company that appears to be a ‘success story’ in what is a highly competitive industry. In the course of our study we found that inscribed in Flight Centre were two, differing discourses which appear to co–exist in creative tension throughout the organization. One discourse is competitive individualism and the other collaborative teamwork. Our paper focuses on how Flight Centre has made use of multiple discourses such as these in the process of achieving competitive advantage, and how people manage the differing discursive logics which confront them on a day–to–day basis. The paper proceeds by identifying the social and textual practices which constitute each discourse. It then establishes the discursive co–existence and tension which exists between the two discourses. Study is made of the conditions under which this discursive co–existence is disrupted. We then identify the interpretative routines and practices through which organizational actors maintain and reproduce discursive co–existence. Our paper concludes by considering a variety of implications of studying multiple discourses in organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian Palmer & Richard Dunford, 2002. "Managing Discursive Tension: the Co–Existence of Individualist and Collaborative Discourses in Flight Centre," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(8), pages 1045-1069, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:39:y:2002:i:8:p:1045-1069
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00323
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-6486.00323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helen Francis & Anne Keegan, 2020. "The Ethics of Engagement in an Age of Austerity: A Paradox Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 593-607, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jomstd:v:39:y:2002:i:8:p:1045-1069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2380 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.