IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v72y2021i7p839-852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting essay quality from search and writing behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Pertti Vakkari
  • Michael Völske
  • Martin Potthast
  • Matthias Hagen
  • Benno Stein

Abstract

Few studies have investigated how search behavior affects complex writing tasks. We analyze a dataset of 150 long essays whose authors searched the ClueWeb09 corpus for source material, while all querying, clicking, and writing activity was meticulously recorded. We model the effect of search and writing behavior on essay quality using path analysis. Since the boil‐down and build‐up writing strategies identified in previous research have been found to affect search behavior, we model each writing strategy separately. Our analysis shows that the search process contributes significantly to essay quality through both direct and mediated effects, while the author's writing strategy moderates this relationship. Our models explain 25–35% of the variation in essay quality through rather simple search and writing process characteristics alone, a fact that has implications on how search engines could personalize result pages for writing tasks. Authors' writing strategies and associated searching patterns differ, producing differences in essay quality. In a nutshell: essay quality improves if search and writing strategies harmonize—build‐up writers benefit from focused, in‐depth querying, while boil‐down writers fare better with a broader and shallower querying strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Pertti Vakkari & Michael Völske & Martin Potthast & Matthias Hagen & Benno Stein, 2021. "Predicting essay quality from search and writing behavior," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(7), pages 839-852, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:72:y:2021:i:7:p:839-852
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24451
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbara M. Wildemuth & Ruth de Bliek & Charles P. Friedman & Dean D. File, 1995. "Medical students' personal knowledge, searching proficiency, and database use in problem solving," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 46(8), pages 590-607, September.
    2. Pertti Vakkari & Saila Huuskonen, 2012. "Search effort degrades search output but improves task outcome," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(4), pages 657-670, April.
    3. William Hersh & Jeffrey Pentecost & David Hickam, 1996. "A task‐oriented approach to information retrieval evaluation," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 47(1), pages 50-56, January.
    4. William Hersh, 1994. "Relevance and retrieval evaluation: Perspectives from medicine," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 45(3), pages 201-206, April.
    5. Khamsum Kinley & Dian Tjondronegoro & Helen Partridge & Sylvia Edwards, 2014. "Modeling users' web search behavior and their cognitive styles," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(6), pages 1107-1123, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anton van der Vegt & Guido Zuccon & Bevan Koopman, 2021. "Do better search engines really equate to better clinical decisions? If not, why not?," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(2), pages 141-155, February.
    2. Johanna I. Westbrook & A. Sophie Gosling & Enrico W. Coiera, 2005. "The Impact of an Online Evidence System on Confidence in Decision Making in a Controlled Setting," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 25(2), pages 178-185, March.
    3. Xiaoli Huang & Dagobert Soergel, 2013. "Relevance: An improved framework for explicating the notion," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(1), pages 18-35, January.
    4. Tuukka Ruotsalo & Giulio Jacucci & Samuel Kaski, 2020. "Interactive faceted query suggestion for exploratory search: Whole‐session effectiveness and interaction engagement," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(7), pages 742-756, July.
    5. Gineke Wiggers & Suzan Verberne & Wouter van Loon & Gerrit‐Jan Zwenne, 2023. "Bibliometric‐enhanced legal information retrieval: Combining usage and citations as flavors of impact relevance," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(8), pages 1010-1025, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:72:y:2021:i:7:p:839-852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.