IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v71y2020i6p644-656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is cross‐lingual readability assessment possible?

Author

Listed:
  • Ion Madrazo Azpiazu
  • Maria Soledad Pera

Abstract

Most research efforts related to automatic readability assessment focus on the design of strategies that apply to a specific language. These state‐of‐the‐art strategies are highly dependent on linguistic features that best suit the language for which they were intended, constraining their adaptability and making it difficult to determine whether they would remain effective if they were applied to estimate the level of difficulty of texts in other languages. In this article, we present the results of a study designed to determine the feasibility of a cross‐lingual readability assessment strategy. For doing so, we first analyzed the most common features used for readability assessment and determined their influence on the readability prediction process of 6 different languages: English, Spanish, Basque, Italian, French, and Catalan. In addition, we developed a cross‐lingual readability assessment strategy that serves as a means to empirically explore the potential advantages of employing a single strategy (and set of features) for readability assessment in different languages, including interlanguage prediction agreement and prediction accuracy improvement for low‐resource languages.

Suggested Citation

  • Ion Madrazo Azpiazu & Maria Soledad Pera, 2020. "Is cross‐lingual readability assessment possible?," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(6), pages 644-656, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:71:y:2020:i:6:p:644-656
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24293
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joel Denning & Maria Soledad Pera & Yiu-Kai Ng, 2016. "A readability level prediction tool for K-12 books," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(3), pages 550-565, March.
    2. Bonsall, Samuel B. & Leone, Andrew J. & Miller, Brian P. & Rennekamp, Kristina, 2017. "A plain English measure of financial reporting readability," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 329-357.
    3. Fang, Bin & Ye, Qiang & Kucukusta, Deniz & Law, Rob, 2016. "Analysis of the perceived value of online tourism reviews: Influence of readability and reviewer characteristics," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 498-506.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grommes, Alexander, 2025. "Impact of audit assurance on the quality of sustainability reporting," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 10(1), pages 201-235.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Zhenhua & Loftus, Serena, 2019. "Multi-method evidence on investors’ reactions to managers’ self-inclusive language," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Cai, Xiaowei & Cebollada, Javier & Cortiñas, Mónica, 2023. "Impact of seller- and buyer-created content on product sales in the electronic commerce platform: The role of informativeness, readability, multimedia richness, and extreme valence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Oun-Joung Park & Jong-hyun Ryu, 2019. "Cognitive fit effects of online reviews on tourists’ information search," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 313-335, September.
    4. Taekyung Kim & Hwirim Jo & Yerin Yhee & Chulmo Koo, 2022. "Robots, artificial intelligence, and service automation (RAISA) in hospitality: sentiment analysis of YouTube streaming data," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 259-275, March.
    5. Li, Hong-Quan & Yang, Yang & Xue, Feng-Wan & Liu, Zhi-Yi, 2024. "Annual report readability and trade credit financing: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    6. Quan Gan & Buhui Qiu, 2021. "The information content of 10‐K file size change," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 21(4), pages 1251-1285, December.
    7. Raffaele Filieri & Elisabetta Raguseo & Claudio Vitari, 2018. "When are extreme ratings more helpful? Empirical evidence on the moderating effects of review characteristics and product type," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01923243, HAL.
    8. Dang, Man & Puwanenthiren, Premkanth & Jones, Edward & Bui, Nguyen & Le, Thuy Dung, 2024. "Does corporate culture shape “Tone at the Top”? Evidence from earnings calls," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    9. Hee-Min Lee & Jee-Won Kang & Young Namkung, 2021. "Instagram Users’ Information Acceptance Process for Food-Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Pinto, Inês & Morais, Ana Isabel & Quick, Reiner, 2020. "The impact of the precision of accounting standards on the expanded auditor’s report in the European Union," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    11. Ruwan Jayathilaka & Thanuja Dharmasena & Nizamuddin Rezahi & Sukheetha Haththotuwegama, 2020. "The impact of online reviews on inbound travellers’ decision making," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 1005-1021, June.
    12. John L. Campbell & Hye Seung “Grace” Lee & Hsin‐Min Lu & Logan B. Steele, 2020. "Express Yourself: Why Managers' Disclosure Tone Varies Across Time and What Investors Learn From It," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(2), pages 1140-1171, June.
    13. Zaman, Rashid, 2024. "When corporate culture matters: The case of stakeholder violations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(1).
    14. Umar, Tarik, 2022. "Complexity aversion when SeekingAlpha," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2).
    15. Di Xiao & Xinyu Yu, 2025. "How do credit ratings affect corporate investment efficiency?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 330-351, January.
    16. Shan, Wei & Wang, Jiaxuan & Shi, Xiaoxiao & David Evans, Richard, 2024. "The impact of electronic word-of-mouth on patients’ choices in online health communities: A cross-media perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    17. M. Fernanda Wagstaff & Gabriela L. Flores & Albert Cannella & Sayan Sarkar & Christine Choirat, 2021. "Construct Validity of Unobtrusive Measures of Organizational Ethical Climates," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(3), pages 158-177, August.
    18. Lu, Chien-Lin & Lin, Chih-Yung & Lin, Tse-Chun & Miao, Bin, 2024. "Financial statement disaggregation and bank loan pricing," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Sungwoo Choi & Anna S. Mattila, 2018. "The Effect of Experience Congruity on Repurchase Intention: The Moderating Role of Public Commitment," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 124-138, June.
    20. Rjiba, Hatem & Saadi, Samir & Boubaker, Sabri & Ding, Xiaoya (Sara), 2021. "Annual report readability and the cost of equity capital," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:71:y:2020:i:6:p:644-656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.