IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jinfst/v71y2020i6p644-656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is cross‐lingual readability assessment possible?

Author

Listed:
  • Ion Madrazo Azpiazu
  • Maria Soledad Pera

Abstract

Most research efforts related to automatic readability assessment focus on the design of strategies that apply to a specific language. These state‐of‐the‐art strategies are highly dependent on linguistic features that best suit the language for which they were intended, constraining their adaptability and making it difficult to determine whether they would remain effective if they were applied to estimate the level of difficulty of texts in other languages. In this article, we present the results of a study designed to determine the feasibility of a cross‐lingual readability assessment strategy. For doing so, we first analyzed the most common features used for readability assessment and determined their influence on the readability prediction process of 6 different languages: English, Spanish, Basque, Italian, French, and Catalan. In addition, we developed a cross‐lingual readability assessment strategy that serves as a means to empirically explore the potential advantages of employing a single strategy (and set of features) for readability assessment in different languages, including interlanguage prediction agreement and prediction accuracy improvement for low‐resource languages.

Suggested Citation

  • Ion Madrazo Azpiazu & Maria Soledad Pera, 2020. "Is cross‐lingual readability assessment possible?," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(6), pages 644-656, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:71:y:2020:i:6:p:644-656
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.24293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24293
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.24293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bonsall, Samuel B. & Leone, Andrew J. & Miller, Brian P. & Rennekamp, Kristina, 2017. "A plain English measure of financial reporting readability," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 329-357.
    2. Fang, Bin & Ye, Qiang & Kucukusta, Deniz & Law, Rob, 2016. "Analysis of the perceived value of online tourism reviews: Influence of readability and reviewer characteristics," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 498-506.
    3. Joel Denning & Maria Soledad Pera & Yiu-Kai Ng, 2016. "A readability level prediction tool for K-12 books," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(3), pages 550-565, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grommes, Alexander, 2025. "Impact of audit assurance on the quality of sustainability reporting," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 10(1), pages 201-235.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yuhao & Li, Qianru & Yan, Jinzhe, 2025. "Exploring multimodal factors in online reviews: A machine learning approach to evaluating content effectiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Pathak, Jalaj, 2025. "Impact of judgment readability on financial crimes," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    3. Inmaculada Rabadán-Martín & Francisco Aguado-Correa & Nuria Padilla-Garrido, 2020. "Online reputation of 4- and 5-star hotels," Tourism and Hospitality Management, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management, vol. 26(1), pages 157-172, June.
    4. Bui, Dien Giau & Chen, Yehning & Chen, Yan-Shing & Lin, Chih-Yung, 2023. "Managerial ability and financial statement disaggregation decisions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    5. Duong, Huu Nhan & Khalifa, Mariem & Sheikhbahaei, Ali & Sualihu, Mohammed Aminu, 2024. "Corporate noncompliance: Do corporate violations affect bank loan contracting?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    6. Carmela Iorio & Giuseppe Pandolfo & Antonio D’Ambrosio & Roberta Siciliano, 2020. "Mining big data in tourism," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(5), pages 1655-1669, December.
    7. Cory A. Cassell & Lauren M. Cunningham & Ling Lei Lisic, 2019. "The readability of company responses to SEC comment letters and SEC 10-K filing review outcomes," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1252-1276, December.
    8. Zhang, Yi & Hu, Ailing & Wang, Jiahua & Zhang, Yaojie, 2022. "Detection of fraud statement based on word vector: Evidence from financial companies in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    9. Chen, Chen & Hanlon, Dean & Khedmati, Mehdi & Wake, James, 2023. "Annual report readability and equity mispricing," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
    10. Cameron Truong & Thu Ha Nguyen & Thanh Huynh, 2021. "Customer satisfaction and the cost of capital," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 293-342, March.
    11. José Alberto Martínez-González & Eduardo Parra-López & Almudena Barrientos-Báez, 2021. "Young Consumers’ Intention to Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    12. Raoofpanah, Iman & Zamudio, César & Groening, Christopher, 2023. "Review reader segmentation based on the heterogeneous impacts of review and reviewer attributes on review helpfulness: A study involving ZIP code data," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Kyriaki Kosmidou & Dimitrios Kousenidis & Anestis Ladas & Christos Negkakis, 2024. "Climate‐related performance and stock price crash risk," Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 113-148, May.
    14. Yanni Ping & Chelsey Hill & Yun Zhu & Jorge Fresneda, 2023. "Antecedents and consequences of the key opinion leader status: an econometric and machine learning approach," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1459-1484, September.
    15. Ahani, Ali & Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh & Yadegaridehkordi, Elaheh & Sanzogni, Louis & Tarik, A. Rashid & Knox, Kathy & Samad, Sarminah & Ibrahim, Othman, 2019. "Revealing customers’ satisfaction and preferences through online review analysis: The case of Canary Islands hotels," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 331-343.
    16. Ariana Furtado & Ricardo F. Ramos & Bruno Maia & Joana Martinho Costa, 2022. "Predictors of Hotel Clients’ Satisfaction in the Cape Verde Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, February.
    17. Huijue Kelly Duan & Hanxin Hu & Yangin (Ben) Yoon & Miklos Vasarhelyi, 2022. "Increasing the utility of performance audit reports: Using textual analytics tools to improve government reporting," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 201-218, October.
    18. Barth, Andreas & Mansouri, Sasan & Wöbbeking, Fabian, 2024. "Information flow and market efficiency -- unintended side effects of the Plain Writing Act," VfS Annual Conference 2024 (Berlin): Upcoming Labor Market Challenges 302384, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    19. Kong, Juan & Lou, Chen, 2023. "Do cultural orientations moderate the effect of online review features on review helpfulness? A case study of online movie reviews," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    20. Liang, Sai & Li, Chunxiao & Zhang, Xiaoxia & Li, Hui, 2020. "The snowball effect in online travel platforms: How does peer influence affect review posting decisions?," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jinfst:v:71:y:2020:i:6:p:644-656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.