IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jindec/v65y2017i4p833-841.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Note on Quality Disclosure and Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Jos Jansen

Abstract

Competitive pressure is lower in markets where goods are more differentiated. I analyze how a change in the degree of horizontal product differentiation affects the incentives of duopolists to disclose quality information. If disclosure is costly, then a firm discloses high qualities but conceals low qualities in equilibrium. The higher the disclosure cost, the higher the equilibrium threshold below which firms conceal quality information. I show that the effect of product differentiation on quality disclosure depends on the cost of disclosure. For low (high) disclosure costs, a firm discloses more (respectively, less) quality information if goods become more differentiated.

Suggested Citation

  • Jos Jansen, 2017. "A Note on Quality Disclosure and Competition," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(4), pages 833-841, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jindec:v:65:y:2017:i:4:p:833-841
    DOI: 10.1111/joie.12139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12139
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/joie.12139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Guangxia & Gong, Yeming & Hong, Xianpei, 2022. "Free rider effect of quality information disclosure in remanufacturing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    2. Haowen Fan & Yulin Zhang & Yang Geng, 2022. "How to avoid your opponent's aggressive competition? The interplay between same‐side network externality and agent information level in two‐sided markets," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2794-2816, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jindec:v:65:y:2017:i:4:p:833-841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-1821 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.