IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v45y2018i1-2p184-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Board governance and corporate performance

Author

Listed:
  • Amama Shaukat
  • Grzegorz Trojanowski

Abstract

We examine the link between the monitoring capacity of the board and corporate performance of UK listed firms. We also investigate how firms use the flexibility offered by the voluntary governance regime to make governance choices. We find a strong positive association between the board governance index we construct and firm operating performance. Our results imply that adherence to the board†related recommendations of the UK Corporate Governance Code strengthens the board's monitoring capacity, potentially helping mitigate agency problems, but that investors do not value it correspondingly. Moreover, in contrast to prior UK findings suggesting efficient adoption of Code recommendations, we find that firms at times use the Code flexibility opportunistically, aiming to decrease the monitoring capacity of the board, which is followed by subsequent underperformance. This finding questions the effectiveness of the voluntary approach to governance regulation followed in the UK and in many countries around the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Amama Shaukat & Grzegorz Trojanowski, 2018. "Board governance and corporate performance," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1-2), pages 184-208, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:45:y:2018:i:1-2:p:184-208
    DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12271
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jbfa.12271?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Othar Kordsachia, 2021. "A risk management perspective on CSR and the marginal cost of debt: empirical evidence from Europe," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1611-1643, August.
    2. Anwer, Zaheer & Azmi, Wajahat & Mohamad, Shamsher, 2023. "Shariah screening and corporate governance: The case of constituent stocks of Dow Jones US Indices," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 976-1002.
    3. Yanlin Li & Gary Gang Tian & Xin Wang, 2023. "Effects of appointing new independent directors who are professionally affiliated with their predecessors: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1-2), pages 267-307, January.
    4. Adrian Doru Bigioi & Cristina Elena Bigioi, 2023. "Governance and Performance in Romanian Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Pamela Brandes & Ravi Dharwadkar & Jonathan F. Ross & Linna Shi, 2022. "Time is of the Essence!: Retired Independent Directors’ Contributions to Board Effectiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 767-793, September.
    6. Hsu, Ching-Yu & Chen, Sheng-Syan & Huang, Chia-Wei, 2021. "Board independence and PIPE offerings," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 478-500.
    7. Peng Xu & Guiyu Bai, 2019. "Board Governance, Sustainable Innovation Capability and Corporate Expansion: Empirical Data from Private Listed Companies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Ha Thanh Nguyen & Balachandran Muniandy, 2021. "Gender, ethnicity and stock liquidity: evidence from South Africa," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 2337-2377, April.
    9. David B. Bryan & Terry W. Mason, 2020. "Independent director reputation incentives, accruals quality and audit fees," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7-8), pages 982-1011, July.
    10. Fareed, Zeeshan & Wang, Nianyong & Shahzad, Farrukh & Meran Shah, Syed Ghulam & Iqbal, Najaf & Zulfiqar, Bushra, 2022. "Does good board governance reduce idiosyncratic risk in emerging markets? Evidence from China," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:45:y:2018:i:1-2:p:184-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.