IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jbfnac/v44y2017i7-8p953-985.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do analysts who understand accounting conservatism exhibit better forecasting performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Jay Heon Jung
  • Sonya S. Lim
  • Jinhan Pae
  • Choong-Yuel Yoo

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Jay Heon Jung & Sonya S. Lim & Jinhan Pae & Choong-Yuel Yoo, 2017. "Do analysts who understand accounting conservatism exhibit better forecasting performance?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(7-8), pages 953-985, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:44:y:2017:i:7-8:p:953-985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/jbfa.2017.44.issue-7-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jani Saastamoinen & Hannu Ojala & Kati Pajunen & Pontus Troberg, 2018. "Analyst Characteristics and the Level of Critical Perception of Goodwill Accounting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(4), pages 538-555, December.
    2. Moy, Melissa & Heaney, Richard & Tarca, Ann & van Zyl, Warrick, 2020. "Conditional accounting conservatism: Exploring the impact of changes in institutional frameworks in four countries," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    3. Minzhi Wu & Mark Wilson, 2022. "How well do analysts really understand asymmetric cost behaviour?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(3), pages 3951-3985, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jbfnac:v:44:y:2017:i:7-8:p:953-985. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0306-686X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.