IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/inecol/v28y2024i6p1900-1911.html

Data quality assessment of aggregated LCI datasets: A case study on fossil‐based and bio‐based plastic food packaging

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Carlesso
  • Lisa Pizzol
  • Antonio Marcomini
  • Elena Semenzin

Abstract

Environmental impacts resulting from plastic food packaging, made from both fossil‐based and bio‐based polymers, are increasingly analyzed in life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. However, the literature reveals significant variations in results for the same polymer within the same scope. To enhance the reliability of these assessments, data quality assessment (DQA) plays a relevant role. However, despite most of the LCA studies employing aggregated life cycle inventory (LCI) datasets, in the literature, DQA methods for aggregated processes are not available. To fill this gap, in this paper, a DQA for aggregated LCI datasets is proposed and demonstrated through its application to 101 aggregated LCI datasets, extracted from Ecoinvent and GaBi databases. The DQA method has been developed by adapting and integrating the pedigree matrix and the data quality ranking proposed by the recently published EC Plastic LCA method. The three data quality indicators (DQIs) used are technological, geographical, and time‐related representativeness. The application of this method exhibits an overall positive evaluation of the selected datasets with differences among the three DQIs. Moreover, it highlights the role of metadata structure in adequately supporting a robust DQA. Indeed, in the absence of a common framework that defines, assesses, and provides access to data quality information, transparency must be assured by the operator in the metadata interpretation and related assumptions along the DQA process. Finally, although the proposed DQA method was developed for the plastic sector, its application can be extended to LCI aggregated datasets relevant to other sectors, materials, and products.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Carlesso & Lisa Pizzol & Antonio Marcomini & Elena Semenzin, 2024. "Data quality assessment of aggregated LCI datasets: A case study on fossil‐based and bio‐based plastic food packaging," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(6), pages 1900-1911, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:6:p:1900-1911
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13572
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jiec.13572?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Lewandowska & Katarzyna Joachimiak-Lechman & Przemysław Kurczewski, 2021. "A Dataset Quality Assessment—An Insight and Discussion on Selected Elements of Environmental Footprints Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Sarah Schmidt & David Laner, 2023. "The environmental performance of plastic packaging waste management in Germany: Current and future key factors," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1447-1460, December.
    3. Shiva Zargar & Yuan Yao & Qingshi Tu, 2022. "A review of inventory modeling methods for missing data in life cycle assessment," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(5), pages 1676-1689, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yao, Yipeng & Duprez, Marie-Eve & De Weireld, Guy, 2025. "A suggested methodological framework to enhance comparability and reliability for life cycle assessment of CO2 adsorption in energy-intensive industries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 397(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Börçe Tunçok-Çeşme & Eren Yıldız-Geyhan & Gökçen Alev Çiftçioğlu, 2024. "Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Two Types of Flexible Plastic Packaging under a Sustainable Circular Economy Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-25, April.
    2. Kofi Armah Boakye-Yiadom & Alessio Ilari & Daniele Duca, 2022. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Life Cycle Assessment on the Black Soldier Fly ( Hermetia illucens L.)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-29, August.
    3. Rao, Pranita Dasi & Van Dael, Miet & Lizin, Sebastien & Van Passel, Steven, 2025. "Upscaling in ex-ante sustainability assessments of emerging chemical technologies: a scoping review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    4. Alexander Fliaster & Karolina Bähr, 2025. "How Companies Move to Circularity: Internal Reorganizing and Adjustment of External Collaboration," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 8450-8469, November.
    5. Shahida Anusha Siddiqui & Ankush Subhash Gadge & Muzaffar Hasan & Teguh Rahayu & Sergey Nikolaevich Povetkin & Ito Fernando & Roberto Castro-Muñoz, 2024. "Future opportunities for products derived from black soldier fly (BSF) treatment as animal feed and fertilizer - A systematic review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 30273-30354, December.
    6. Jean Léon Boucher & Diana Alfonso-Bécares & J. J. Larrabeiti-Rodríguez & Alejandro Marcos-Valls & Rony Mauricio Parra Jácome & Maddalena Ripa & Alireza Taghdisian & Raúl Velasco-Fernández & Keith Matt, 2025. "Where’s the data? Challenges in characterizing the sustainability of socioecological systems," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Luke Cullen & Andrea Marinoni & Jonathan Cullen, 2024. "Machine learning for gap‐filling in greenhouse gas emissions databases," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(4), pages 636-647, August.
    8. Kwon, Yuree & An, Jinjoo, 2024. "Comparative life cycle assessment of landfill gas utilization in South Korea with parametric uncertainties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    9. Gkousis, Spiros & Vasilaki, Vasileia & Katsou, Evina, 2026. "Machine learning and large language models for life cycle inventory compilation: Current situation and future developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    10. Giusilene Costa de Souza Pinho & João Luiz Calmon, 2023. "LCA of Wood Waste Management Systems: Guiding Proposal for the Standardization of Studies Based on a Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
    11. L. H. Aramyan & Eggo U. Thoden van Velzen & N. Herceglić & G.M. Splinter & A. Susa, 2025. "Unlocking the biobased future: investigating recycling lock-ins and corporate power in the adoption of biobased food packaging," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 27(3), pages 471-509, July.
    12. Seth Kane & Sabbie A. Miller, 2024. "Mass, enthalpy, and chemical‐derived emission flows in mineral processing," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(3), pages 469-481, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:inecol:v:28:y:2024:i:6:p:1900-1911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1088-1980 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.