IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v50y2026i2p309-328.html

BEYOND THE PARALYSIS OF THE POST‐POLITICAL? The Micropolitical in Post‐Political Participatory Planning in Copenhagen, Denmark

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie Loveless

Abstract

Participatory planning is widely used for the purpose of democratizing urban governance. Yet, the literature on post‐politics largely depicts participatory decision‐making contexts as spaces devoid of the ‘properly political’. Scholars critical of post‐politics find this lens paralyzing, as the approach may disregard political moments arising within participatory settings. The lens is useful for diagnosing a decision‐making context as post‐political on a broader level, but there is a tendency to paper over the significance of the micropolitical landscape operating inside institutional participatory decision‐making settings. Revealing this landscape, as is done here for a case of urban renewal in Copenhagen, can help us move beyond the analytical straitjacket of post‐politics and defy a simplified image of it. Taking localized political acts seriously, I analyze the actors and practices that emerged during participatory processes used to create two new public parks during a large‐scale urban renewal project in the Nørrebro neighborhood in Copenhagen, Denmark from 2001 to 2012. The findings include: conceptually, a dialectical relationship between post‐politics and re‐politicization; empirically, the construction of a post‐political police order, the mechanics of (de)politization, and how opposition interacts with these factors; and, more generally, how voices are reclaimed from noise and the significance of these political moments.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie Loveless, 2026. "BEYOND THE PARALYSIS OF THE POST‐POLITICAL? The Micropolitical in Post‐Political Participatory Planning in Copenhagen, Denmark," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 309-328, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:50:y:2026:i:2:p:309-328
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.70005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.70005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.70005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:50:y:2026:i:2:p:309-328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.