IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v45y2021i2p266-281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governance of Waterfront Regeneration Projects: Experiences from Two Second‐tier Cities in Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Brita Hermelin
  • Robert Jonsson

Abstract

This article takes its point of departure from research debates about how waterfront regeneration projects are rooted in urban entrepreneurial governance that involves local boosterism and high demands on management of funding and financial risks. The empirical study investigates two second‐tier cities in Sweden. The study illustrates that the projects for the two cities are managed in quite different ways. This confirms the importance of recognizing that urban processes are conditioned by the local configuration of actors and practices. The concluding discussion also emphasizes the multi‐layer structure of the public sector. It is suggested that the quite uneven distribution of national infrastructure investment is detrimental to the potential of wider development effects of waterfront generation projects for second‐tier cities. Thus, although this article shows that the model for large‐scale waterfront regeneration projects is on one level viable for cities on the second‐tier level of city systems, it must be remembered that the effects on the wider urban development may diverge from the effects of such investments for first‐tier and larger urban centres.

Suggested Citation

  • Brita Hermelin & Robert Jonsson, 2021. "Governance of Waterfront Regeneration Projects: Experiences from Two Second‐tier Cities in Sweden," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 266-281, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:45:y:2021:i:2:p:266-281
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12966
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.12966?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zeenat Kotval-K & Cassi Meitl & Zenia Kotval, 2017. "Should the public sector play a greater role funding brownfield redevelopment projects? A transatlantic comparison," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 366-383, October.
    2. Daniel Galland & Carsten Hansen, 2012. "The Roles of Planning in Waterfront Redevelopment: From Plan-led and Market-driven Styles to Hybrid Planning?," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 203-225.
    3. Brian Doucet & Ronald Van Kempen & Jan Van Weesep, 2011. "Resident Perceptions Of Flagship Waterfront Regeneration: The Case Of The Kop Van Zuid In Rotterdam," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 102(2), pages 125-145, April.
    4. Ståle Holgersen, 2015. "Crisis and the Post-Industrial City: Or is Malmö Building Yesterday's City Tomorrow, Again?," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 106(3), pages 231-245, July.
    5. Andrew L. Jones, 2017. "Regenerating Urban Waterfronts—Creating Better Futures—From Commercial and Leisure Market Places to Cultural Quarters and Innovation Districts," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 333-344, May.
    6. Ana Mafalda Madureira & Guy Baeten, 2016. "By invitation only: uses and users of the ‘entrepreneurial city’," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 362-376, October.
    7. Jamie Peck, 2017. "Transatlantic city, part 1: Conjunctural urbanism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(1), pages 4-30, January.
    8. Sandra Alker & Victoria Joy & Peter Roberts & Nathan Smith, 2000. "The Definition of Brownfield," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 49-69.
    9. Ute Lehrer & Jennefer Laidley, 2008. "Old Mega‐Projects Newly Packaged? Waterfront Redevelopment in Toronto," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 786-803, December.
    10. Craig Leger & Christopher Balch & Stephen Essex, 2016. "Understanding the Planning Challenges of Brownfield Development in Coastal Urban Areas of England," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 119-131, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Terence Fell & Johanna Mattsson, 2021. "The Role of Public-Private Partnerships in Housing as a Potential Contributor to Sustainable Cities and Communities: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koi Yu Adolf Ng & César Ducruet, 2014. "The changing tides of port geography (1950–2012)," Post-Print halshs-01359160, HAL.
    2. Heng Zhang & Guiwen Liu & Qingye Han & Gong Chen, 2022. "Mapping the Barriers of Utilizing Public Private Partnership into Brownfield Remediation Projects in the Public Land Ownership," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Zhao, Qianyu & Xu, Hang & Wall, Ronald S & Stavropoulos, Spyridon, 2017. "Building a bridge between port and city: Improving the urban competitiveness of port cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 120-133.
    4. Tom Gillespie, 2020. "The Real Estate Frontier," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 599-616, July.
    5. Jennifer Robinson & Katia Attuyer, 2021. "Extracting Value, London Style: Revisiting the Role of the State in Urban Development," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 303-331, March.
    6. Perić Ana, 2016. "Institutional Cooperation in the Brownfield Regeneration Process: Experiences from Central and Eastern European Countries," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 23(1), pages 21-46, June.
    7. Marjorie Tendero & Cécile Bazart, 2018. "" Empty lands " ? Social representations of contaminated brownfields in France," Working Papers halshs-01709548, HAL.
    8. Han, Qingye & Zhu, Yuming & Ke, Ginger Y. & Hipel, Keith W., 2019. "Public private partnership in brownfield remediation projects in China: Identification and structure analysis of risks," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 87-104.
    9. Bruce K. Johnson & John C. Whitehead & Daniel S. Mason & Gordon J. Walker, 2012. "Willingness to Pay for Downtown Public Goods Generated by Large, Sports-Anchored Development Projects: The CVM Approach," Working Papers 12-01, Department of Economics, Appalachian State University.
    10. Tom A. Daamen & Erik Louw, 2016. "The Challenge of the Dutch Port-City Interface," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(5), pages 642-651, December.
    11. Kronenburg García, Angela & Meyfroidt, Patrick & Abeygunawardane, Dilini & Sitoe, Almeida A., 2022. "Waves and legacies: The making of an investment frontier in Niassa, Mozambique," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(1).
    12. Tomáš Krejčí & Josef Navrátil & Stanislav Martinát & Ryan J. Frazier & Petr Klusáček & Kamil Pícha & Jaroslav Škrabal & Robert Osman, 2021. "Spatial Unevenness of Formation, Remediation and Persistence of Post-Agricultural Brownfields," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Eran Weinberg & Nir Cohen & Orit Rotem-Mindali, 2019. "LUD as an Instrument for (Sub)Metropolitanization: The 1000-District in Rishon-Lezion, Israel as a Case Study," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 18-30.
    14. Sutama Ghosh, 2014. "Everyday Lives in Vertical Neighbourhoods: Exploring Bangladeshi Residential Spaces in Toronto's Inner Suburbs," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 2008-2024, November.
    15. Ricardo J. G. Mateus & João C. Bana e Costa & Pedro Verga Matos, 2017. "Supporting Multicriteria Group Decisions with MACBETH Tools: Selection of Sustainable Brownfield Redevelopment Actions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 495-521, May.
    16. B Glumac & Q Han & W Schaefer, 2018. "A negotiation decision model for public–private partnerships in brownfield redevelopment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(1), pages 145-160, January.
    17. Murphy James T., 2022. "Urban-economic geographies beyond production: Nairobi’s sociotechnical system and the challenge of generative urbanization," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 66(1), pages 18-35, May.
    18. Mikael Granberg & Lars Nyberg & Lars-Erik Modh, 2016. "Understanding the local policy context of risk management: Competitiveness and adaptation to climate risks in the city of Karlstad, Sweden," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(1), pages 26-46, February.
    19. Colin Lorne, 2020. "The limits to openness: Co-working, design and social innovation in the neoliberal city," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(4), pages 747-765, June.
    20. Mellor, P. & Lord, R.A. & João, E. & Thomas, R. & Hursthouse, A., 2021. "Identifying non-agricultural marginal lands as a route to sustainable bioenergy provision - A review and holistic definition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:45:y:2021:i:2:p:266-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.