IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v33y2009i1p147-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contesting Property Development in Coastal New Zealand: A Case Study of Ocean Beach, Hawke's Bay

Author

Listed:
  • DAMIAN COLLINS

Abstract

This article considers the contested process of coastal development in New Zealand and the implications of both governmental regulation and public concern for understanding property. Its empirical focus is a proposal for a substantial, new urbanist development at Ocean Beach, located in the Hawke's Bay region of the North Island. Three key sources of data inform the research: published reports; public submissions to council; and interviews with a sample of those involved in the planning process. Opposition to development is explained in terms of three broad areas of concern: the dramatic physical and social changes that would accompany subdivision and construction; fears of a loss of control over a valued local landscape; and a morally informed sense of propriety. The article finds that the ownership model of property is not especially powerful at Ocean Beach; rather, there is a broad consensus that private property rights exist within a public planning framework. It is this framework that contributes, in large part, to ensuring that voices of community opposition to property development at Ocean Beach (and elsewhere along the coast) are heard. Nevertheless, private property rights are rarely dismissed completely. Résumé Cet article porte sur une démarche contestée d'aménagement côtier en Nouvelle‐Zélande, ainsi sur les incidences de la réglementation gouvernementale et de l'inquiétude de la population, pour mieux comprendre le sens de la propriété. Sur le plan empirique, il s'intéresse à une vaste urbanisation nouvelle proposée sur le site d'Ocean Beach situé dans la région de Hawke's Bay dans l'île du Nord. L'étude tire ses données de trois sources principales: rapports publiés, soumissions publiques auprès du conseil, et entretiens avec un groupe représentatif de personnes impliquées dans le processus d'aménagement. L'opposition au complexe s'articule autour de trois grands domaines de préoccupation: les changements physiques et sociaux radicaux qu'occasionneraient subdivision et construction; les craintes de perdre la maîtrise d'un paysage local prisé; un sens de la propriété reposant sur des valeurs morales. Le modèle de propriété immobilière ne s'impose pas particulièrement à Ocean Beach; on y trouve plutôt un large consensus pour que les droits de propriété privée existent dans un cadre d'aménagement public. C'est ce cadre qui contribue en grande partie à garantir que soient entendues les voix de la communauté opposées à l'aménagement immobilier d'Ocean Beach (ou sur tout autre site côtier). Néanmoins les droits de propriété privée sont rarement complètement rejetés.

Suggested Citation

  • Damian Collins, 2009. "Contesting Property Development in Coastal New Zealand: A Case Study of Ocean Beach, Hawke's Bay," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 147-164, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:33:y:2009:i:1:p:147-164
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00836.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00836.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00836.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen J. Essex & Graham P. Brown, 1997. "The Emergence of Post‐Suburban Landscapes on the North Coast of New South Wales: A Case Study of Contested Space," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 259-287, June.
    2. B. J. Gleeson & K. J. Grundy, 1997. "New Zealand's Planning Revolution Five Years On: A Preliminary Assessment," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 293-314.
    3. Damian Collins & Robin Kearns, 2008. "Uninterrupted Views: Real-Estate Advertising and Changing Perspectives on Coastal Property in New Zealand," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(12), pages 2914-2932, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. L. Richard Little & Brenda B. Lin, 2017. "A decision analysis approach to climate adaptation: a structured method to consider multiple options," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 15-28, January.
    2. Buket Özdemir Işık & Sara Demir, 2017. "Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for the Sustainability of Historical–Cultural Structures on the Trabzon Coastline," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Yaoqi Zhang & Sheng Li & Zhimei Guo, 2015. "The Evolution of the Coastal Economy: The Role of Working Waterfronts in the Alabama Gulf Coast," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Brenda Lin & Yong Khoo & Matthew Inman & Chi-Hsiang Wang & Sorada Tapsuwan & Xiaoming Wang, 2014. "Assessing inundation damage and timing of adaptation: sea level rise and the complexities of land use in coastal communities," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 551-568, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahel Nüssli & Christian Schmid, 2016. "Beyond the Urban–Suburban Divide: Urbanization and the Production of the Urban in Zurich North," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 679-701, May.
    2. Laurence Murphy, 2008. "Third-wave Gentrification in New Zealand: The Case of Auckland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2521-2540, November.
    3. Nicholas A Phelps & Andrew M Wood & David C Valler, 2010. "A Postsuburban World? An Outline of a Research Agenda," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(2), pages 366-383, February.
    4. Matthew Tonts, 1999. "Some recent trends in Australian regional economic development policy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(6), pages 581-586.
    5. Nicholas A. Phelps & Andrew M. Wood, 2011. "The New Post-suburban Politics?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(12), pages 2591-2610, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:33:y:2009:i:1:p:147-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.