IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v40y2025i2p458-473.html

Public Health Crisis Management Caused by COVID‐19: A Scientometrics Review

Author

Listed:
  • Sen Wang
  • Miaomei Liu

Abstract

The COVID‐19 pandemic was one of the most serious public health events of the 21st century, which had a profound impact on the entire human society and sparked extensive debate and research on public health crisis management. To clarify the development path of the issue and to discover the structure and internal logic of related studies, this study conducted a scientometric analysis (co‐citation analysis, co‐occurrence analysis, cooperation network analysis, knowledge domain migration analysis) of 8814 publications from the Web of Science Core Collection and PubMed using CiteSpace, and drew the following conclusions: (1) The research focuses on empirical studies in medicine and other fields, and expands to non‐medical fields such as “social media”, “COVID‐19 lockdown”, and “air quality”; (2) The USA, UK, Italy and other major developed countries in Europe and America are leading the research trend, while developing countries, notably China, India and Brazil have become the important contributors to the study of this issue in different ways; (3) The research results at this stage are mainly in the fields of medicine, health and biology and are cited internally, but are also developing in the direction of economics, political, environmental and other fields. Finally, this study summarises some of the issues that should be of concern to public health crisis management in the post‐pandemic era, in the hope of providing some insight for researchers on this issue.

Suggested Citation

  • Sen Wang & Miaomei Liu, 2025. "Public Health Crisis Management Caused by COVID‐19: A Scientometrics Review," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 458-473, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:2:p:458-473
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3867
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mingers, John & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2015. "A review of theory and practice in scientometrics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 1-19.
    2. René Lezama-Nicolás & Marisela Rodríguez-Salvador & Rosa Río-Belver & Iñaki Bildosola, 2018. "A bibliometric method for assessing technological maturity: the case of additive manufacturing," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(3), pages 1425-1452, December.
    3. Wei Zhou & Qingjuan Chen & Sun Meng, 2019. "Knowledge mapping of credit risk research: scientometrics analysis using CiteSpace," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 3457-3484, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lutz Bornmann & Robin Haunschild & Sven E. Hug, 2018. "Visualizing the context of citations referencing papers published by Eugene Garfield: a new type of keyword co-occurrence analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(2), pages 427-437, February.
    2. Deming Lin & Tianhui Gong & Wenbin Liu & Martin Meyer, 2020. "An entropy-based measure for the evolution of h index research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2283-2298, December.
    3. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo, 2021. "A bibliometric methodology to unveil territorial inequities in the scientific wealth to combat COVID-19," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6601-6624, August.
    4. Keeheon Lee, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Social Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence in Product Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Biró, Tamás S. & Telcs, András & Józsa, Máté & Néda, Zoltán, 2023. "Gintropic scaling of scientometric indexes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 618(C).
    6. Blanka Tundys & Tomasz Wiśniewski, 2023. "Renewable Energy Supply Chains—Text Mining and Co-Occurrence Analysis in the Context of the Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Juan Miguel Campanario, 2018. "Are leaders really leading? Journals that are first in Web of Science subject categories in the context of their groups," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 111-130, April.
    8. Steve J. Bickley & Ho Fai Chan & Benno Torgler, 2022. "Artificial intelligence in the field of economics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 2055-2084, April.
    9. Boczek, Michał & Hovana, Anton & Hutník, Ondrej & Kaluszka, Marek, 2021. "New monotone measure-based integrals inspired by scientific impact problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 346-357.
    10. Sezai Tunca & Yavuz Selim Balcioglu, 2025. "Mapping the landscape of entrepreneurial education research: a bibliometric analysis of trends, themes, and future directions," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 5(11), pages 1-37, November.
    11. Ainun Hasanah & Jing Wu, 2025. "Bibliometric analysis and global research trends of climate change and cities studies for 30 years (1990–2021)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 5573-5617, March.
    12. Raminta Pranckutė, 2021. "Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-59, March.
    13. Juan Miguel Campanario, 2017. "JIF-Plots: using plots of citations versus citable items as a tool to study journals and subject categories and discover new scientometric relationships," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 1141-1154, November.
    14. Singgih Sugiarto & Thomas Sixtus Iswahyudi Hari Widodo & Suyanto Suyanto, 2024. "Do open acces journal articles experience citation advantage?," Record and Library Journal, D3 Perpustakaan Fakultas Vokasi Universitas Airlangga, vol. 10(2), pages 292-303.
    15. Akbar Hossain Kanan & Carlo Giupponi, 2024. "Coastal Socio-Ecological Systems Adapting to Climate Change: A Global Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-23, November.
    16. Sahoo, Biresh & Singh, Ramadhar & Mishra, Bineet & Sankaran, Krithiga, 2015. "Research Productivity in Management Schools of India: A Directional Benefit-of-Doubt Model Analysis," MPRA Paper 67046, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Lazebnik, Teddy & Aviv-Reuven, Shir & Rosenfeld, Ariel, 2025. "Publishing instincts: An exploration-exploitation framework for studying academic publishing behavior and “Home Venues”," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
    18. Floris Goerlandt & Jie Li & Genserik Reniers, 2021. "The Landscape of Risk Perception Research: A Scientometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-26, November.
    19. Yanbo Zhou & Xin-Li Xu & Xu-Hua Yang & Qu Li, 2022. "The influence of disruption on evaluating the scientific significance of papers," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(10), pages 5931-5945, October.
    20. Рубинштейн Александр Яковлевич, "undated". "Ранжирование Российских Экономических Журналов: Научный Метод Или «Игра В Цыфирь»? [Ran Ranking of Russian Economic Journals: The Scientific Method or “Numbers Game”?]," Working papers a:pru175:ye:2016:1, Institute of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:40:y:2025:i:2:p:458-473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.