IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i5p1004-1020.html

Fragmented Governance in the Belt and Road Initiative: Aligning Policy With SDGs 8 and 9

Author

Listed:
  • Haisheng Hu
  • Jernej Pikalo

Abstract

This study investigates how fragmented governance shapes the Belt and Road Initiative's (BRI) contributions to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 8 and 9. Although the BRI's stated objectives align with the SDG agenda, empirical evidence from EU countries reveals that institutional fragmentation and policy misalignment can significantly hinder sustainable development outcomes. Employing a mixed‐methods approach, the study applies Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to a corpus of 321 BRI‐related policy documents to extract thematic patterns and assess their semantic alignment with SDG 8 and 9 keyword frameworks. It then analyzes governance fragmentation at the domestic level, EU‐member states level, and China‐EU level, complemented by case studies of Italy, Poland, Croatia, and Slovenia to explore how different levels of fragmentation impede BRI project implementation and weaken SDG progress. The findings reveal three key insights: (1) BRI‐related discourse demonstrates moderate alignment with SDGs 8 and 9 in terms of policy narratives; (2) governance fragmentation in EU countries is multi‐dimensional and structurally embedded; and (3) fragmentation undermines BRI project continuity and its developmental impact. This research proposes a three‐pronged policy framework comprising politically neutral commitment mechanisms, EU‐compatible regulatory alignment guidelines, and adaptive pathways for SDG compliance—designed to strengthen institutional coherence and enhance the sustainability of cross‐border BRI cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Haisheng Hu & Jernej Pikalo, 2025. "Fragmented Governance in the Belt and Road Initiative: Aligning Policy With SDGs 8 and 9," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1004-1020, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:5:p:1004-1020
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70087
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vandudzai Mbanda & Willem Fourie, 2020. "The 2030 Agenda and coherent national development policy: In dialogue with South African policymakers on Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 751-758, July.
    2. Frank Biermann & Philipp Pattberg & Harro van Asselt & Fariborz Zelli, 2009. "The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 9(4), pages 14-40, November.
    3. Nicholas Evangelopoulos & Xiaoni Zhang & Victor R Prybutok, 2012. "Latent Semantic Analysis: five methodological recommendations," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 70-86, January.
    4. Pierson, Paul, 2000. "Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 94(2), pages 251-267, June.
    5. Fariborz Zelli & Harro van Asselt, 2013. "Introduction: The Institutional Fragmentation of Global Environmental Governance: Causes, Consequences, and Responses," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, August.
    6. Yixian Sun & Bowen Yu, 2023. "Greening China’s Belt and Road Initiative: From Norm Localization to Norm Subsidiarity?," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 23(1), pages 91-116, Winter.
    7. Jean-Charles Lamirel & Francis Lareau & Christophe Malaterre, 2024. "CFMf topic-model: comparison with LDA and Top2Vec," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(10), pages 6387-6405, October.
    8. Tuna Taşan-Kok & Sara Özogul, 2021. "Fragmented governance architectures underlying residential property production in Amsterdam," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(6), pages 1314-1330, September.
    9. Shuhong Peng & Jing Qian & Xiuwei Xing & Jing Wang & Aliya Adeli & Shujie Wei, 2025. "Technological Cooperation for Sustainable Development Under the Belt and Road Initiative and the Sustainable Development Goals: Opportunities and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-27, January.
    10. Marcel J. Dorsch & Christian Flachsland, 2017. "A Polycentric Approach to Global Climate Governance," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 17(2), pages 45-64, May.
    11. Mingming Jiang & Jianhong Qi & Zhitong Zhang, 2022. "Under the same roof? The Green Belt and Road Initiative and firms’ heterogeneous responses," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 316-338, December.
    12. Silvia Bruzzi & Enrico Ivaldi & Marta Santagata, 2022. "Measuring Regional Performance in the Italian NHS: Are Disparities Decreasing?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 1057-1084, February.
    13. Sebastian Barnes, 2022. "EU Fiscal Governance Reforms: A Perspective of Independent Fiscal Institutions," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 57(1), pages 21-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jens Heidingsfelder & Markus Beckmann, 2020. "A governance puzzle to be solved? A systematic literature review of fragmented sustainability governance," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 355-390, August.
    2. Alexandre Gajevic Sayegh, 2020. "Moral duties, compliance and polycentric climate governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 483-506, September.
    3. Alexandre Gajevic Sayegh, 0. "Moral duties, compliance and polycentric climate governance," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    4. Daniel Muth & Mathieu Blondeel & Philipp Pattberg, 2025. "The Architecture of Global Carbon Pricing Governance: Institutions, Functions and Policy Pathways," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(5), pages 811-828, November.
    5. Rakhyun Kim & Brendan Mackey, 2014. "International environmental law as a complex adaptive system," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 5-24, March.
    6. Piero Morseletto & Frank Biermann & Philipp Pattberg, 2017. "Governing by targets: reductio ad unum and evolution of the two-degree climate target," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 655-676, October.
    7. Carmen Rodríguez Fernández-Blanco & Sarah L. Burns & Lukas Giessen, 2019. "Mapping the fragmentation of the international forest regime complex: institutional elements, conflicts and synergies," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 187-205, April.
    8. Michelle Betsill & Navroz K. Dubash & Matthew Paterson & Harro van Asselt & Antto Vihma & Harald Winkler, 2015. "Building Productive Links between the UNFCCC and the Broader Global Climate Governance Landscape," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 15(2), pages 1-10, May.
    9. Jonas Meckling, 2019. "Governing renewables: Policy feedback in a global energy transition," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(2), pages 317-338, March.
    10. Tianhan Gui & Bo Jia, 2026. "Temporary Voices in Permanent Halls: Institutionalized Decoupling in United Nations Consultant Employment," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 17(2), pages 353-364, May.
    11. Lasse Folke Henriksen & Stefano Ponte, 2018. "Public orchestration, social networks, and transnational environmental governance: Lessons from the aviation industry," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(1), pages 23-45, March.
    12. Ibnu Budiman & Mattijs Smits, 2020. "How Do Configuration Shifts in Fragmented Energy Governance Affect Policy Output? A Case Study of Changing Biogas Regimes in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Marjanneke Vijge, 2013. "The promise of new institutionalism: explaining the absence of a World or United Nations Environment Organisation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 153-176, May.
    14. W. Pieter Pauw, 2017. "Mobilising private adaptation finance: developed country perspectives," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 55-71, February.
    15. Pickering, Jonathan & Jotzo, Frank & Wood, Peter J., 2015. "Splitting the difference: can limited coordination achieve a fair distribution of the global climate financing effort?," Working Papers 249508, Australian National University, Centre for Climate Economics & Policy.
    16. Ongolo, Symphorien, 2015. "On the banality of forest governance fragmentation: Exploring ‘‘gecko politics’’ as a bureaucratic behaviour in limited statehood," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 12-20.
    17. Hao Zhang, 2022. "China and Climate Multilateralism: A Review of Theoretical Approaches," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 50-60.
    18. Laurence Delina, 2017. "Multilateral development banking in a fragmented climate system: shifting priorities in energy finance at the Asian Development Bank," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 73-88, February.
    19. Clara Brandi, 2021. "The Interaction of Private and Public Governance: The Case of Sustainability Standards for Palm Oil," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 33(6), pages 1574-1595, December.
    20. Melanie van Driel & Frank Biermann & Rakhyun E. Kim & Marjanneke J. Vijge, 2022. "International organisations as ‘custodians’ of the sustainable development goals? Fragmentation and coordination in sustainability governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(5), pages 669-682, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:5:p:1004-1020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.