IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v15y2024is2p51-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From developing country to superpower? China, power shifts and the United Nations development pillar

Author

Listed:
  • Max‐Otto Baumann
  • Sebastian Haug
  • Silke Weinlich

Abstract

This article contributes to the expanding literature on China's position in international organisations by examining the extent to which, and how, China's exercise of power in the United Nations (UN) development pillar has evolved over the last decade. Building on a four‐legged power framework, we contrast the status quo of power configurations in UN development work with China's evolving attempts to exercise compulsory, institutional, structural and productive power. We identify a heterogeneous set of engagement patterns and find that China's standing as a developing country is an integral part of how its global power ambitions unfold at the UN. While shifts in China's power in and through UN development work have remained limited, taken together insights from the power type analysis suggest that China is in the process of challenging and/or redefining some of the central contours of the UN development pillar.

Suggested Citation

  • Max‐Otto Baumann & Sebastian Haug & Silke Weinlich, 2024. "From developing country to superpower? China, power shifts and the United Nations development pillar," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 51-61, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:s2:p:51-61
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13260
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Toye, 2014. "Assessing the G77: 50 years after and 40 years after the," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 1759-1774, November.
    2. Barnett, Michael & Duvall, Raymond, 2005. "Power in International Politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(1), pages 39-75, January.
    3. Andreas Kruck & Bernhard Zangl, 2020. "The Adjustment of International Institutions to Global Power Shifts: A Framework for Analysis," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 5-16, October.
    4. Stephen, Matthew D., 2014. "States, Norms and Power: Emerging Powers and Global Order," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 42(3), pages 888-896.
    5. Paul Novosad & Eric Werker, 2019. "Who runs the international system? Nationality and leadership in the United Nations Secretariat," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-33, March.
    6. Mao, Ruipeng, 2020. "China's growing engagement with the UNDS as an emerging nation: Changing rationales, funding preferences and future trends," IDOS Discussion Papers 2/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    7. Weinlich, Silke & Baumann, Max-Otto & Lundsgaarde, Erik & Wolff, Peter, 2020. "Earmarking in the multilateral development system: Many shades of grey," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 101, number 101, December.
    8. Parizek, Michal & Stephen, Matthew D., 2021. "The Increasing Representativeness of International Organizations’ Secretariats: Evidence from the United Nations System, 1997–2015," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 65(1), pages 197-209.
    9. Lake, David A. & Martin, Lisa L. & Risse, Thomas, 2021. "Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(2), pages 225-257, February.
    10. Waisbich, Laura Trajber & Haug, Sebastian, 2022. "Partnerships for policy transfer: How Brazil and China engage in triangular cooperation with the United Nations," IDOS Discussion Papers 15/2022, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    11. Sebastian Haug, 2021. "A Thirdspace approach to the ‘Global South’: insights from the margins of a popular category," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(9), pages 2018-2038, September.
    12. Amitav Acharya, 2016. "‘Idea-shift’: how ideas from the rest are reshaping global order," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(7), pages 1156-1170, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Haug & Rosemary Foot & Max‐Otto Baumann, 2024. "Power shifts in international organisations: China at the United Nations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 5-17, May.
    2. Wenting Meng, 2024. "Is power shifting? China's evolving engagement with UNESCO," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 97-109, May.
    3. Xueying Zhang & Yijia Jing, 2024. "A mixed funding pattern: China's exercise of power within the United Nations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 121-134, May.
    4. Andrew Lugg, 2024. "Re-contracting intergovernmental organizations: Membership change and the creation of linked intergovernmental organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 545-577, September.
    5. Haug, Sebastian, 2021. "Mainstreaming South-South and triangular cooperation: Work in progress at the United Nations," IDOS Discussion Papers 15/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    6. Vaclav Vlcek, 2023. "Who cares about the UN General Assembly? National delegations size from 1993 to 2016," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 349-360, May.
    7. Leonard Schuette & Hylke Dijkstra, 2023. "The show must go on: The EU's quest to sustain multilateral institutions since 2016," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1318-1336, September.
    8. Shing‐hon Lam & Courtney J. Fung, 2024. "Personnel power shift? Unpacking China's attempts to enter the UN civil service," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 135-147, May.
    9. Duncan Snidal & Thomas Hale & Emily Jones & Claas Mertens & Karolina Milewicz, 2024. "The power of the “weak” and international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 385-409, September.
    10. Fuß, Julia & Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian & Saravia, Andrés & Zürn, Michael, 2021. "Managing regime complexity: Introducing the interface conflicts 1.0 dataset," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2021-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    11. Simon Hartmann & Thomas Lindner & Jakob Müllner & Jonas Puck, 2022. "Beyond the nation-state: Anchoring supranational institutions in international business research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 1282-1306, August.
    12. Jun Zhang, 2008. "EU in ASEM: its role in framing inter-regional cooperation with East Asian countries," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 487-505, November.
    13. João Carlos Ferraz & Juliana Santiago & Luma Ramos, 2023. "Policy innovation for sustainable development: the case of the Amazon Fund," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 109-136, April.
    14. Mathieu Rousselin, 2012. "The EU as a Multilateral Rule Exporter - The Global Transfer of European Rules via International Organizations," KFG Working Papers p0048, Free University Berlin.
    15. Maria J. Debre & Hylke Dijkstra, 2023. "Are international organisations in decline? An absolute and relative perspective on institutional change," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 16-30, February.
    16. Naseemullah, Adnan, 2023. "The political economy of national development: A research agenda after neoliberal reform?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    17. Mark Beeson & Jolanta Hewitt, 2022. "Does Multilateralism still Matter? ASEAN and the Arctic Council in Comparative Perspective," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(2), pages 208-218, May.
    18. Wolfe, Robert, 2013. "Letting the sun shine in at the WTO: How transparency brings the trading system to life," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2013-03, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    19. Frank Biermann & Michele Betsill & Joyeeta Gupta & Norichika Kanie & Louis Lebel & Diana Liverman & Heike Schroeder & Bernd Siebenhüner & Ruben Zondervan, 2010. "Earth system governance: a research framework," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 277-298, December.
    20. Juerges, Nataly & Arts, Bas & Masiero, Mauro & Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke & Borges, José G. & Brodrechtova, Yvonne & Brukas, Vilis & Canadas, Maria João & Carvalho, Pedro Ochôa & Corradini, Giulia & Cor, 2021. "Power analysis as a tool to analyse trade-offs between ecosystem services in forest management: A case study from nine European countries," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:s2:p:51-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.