IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v15y2024is2p51-61.html

From developing country to superpower? China, power shifts and the United Nations development pillar

Author

Listed:
  • Max‐Otto Baumann
  • Sebastian Haug
  • Silke Weinlich

Abstract

This article contributes to the expanding literature on China's position in international organisations by examining the extent to which, and how, China's exercise of power in the United Nations (UN) development pillar has evolved over the last decade. Building on a four‐legged power framework, we contrast the status quo of power configurations in UN development work with China's evolving attempts to exercise compulsory, institutional, structural and productive power. We identify a heterogeneous set of engagement patterns and find that China's standing as a developing country is an integral part of how its global power ambitions unfold at the UN. While shifts in China's power in and through UN development work have remained limited, taken together insights from the power type analysis suggest that China is in the process of challenging and/or redefining some of the central contours of the UN development pillar.

Suggested Citation

  • Max‐Otto Baumann & Sebastian Haug & Silke Weinlich, 2024. "From developing country to superpower? China, power shifts and the United Nations development pillar," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 51-61, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:s2:p:51-61
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13260
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Waisbich, Laura Trajber & Haug, Sebastian, 2022. "Partnerships for policy transfer: How Brazil and China engage in triangular cooperation with the United Nations," IDOS Discussion Papers 15/2022, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. John Toye, 2014. "Assessing the G77: 50 years after and 40 years after the," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 1759-1774, November.
    3. Weinlich, Silke & Baumann, Max-Otto & Lundsgaarde, Erik & Wolff, Peter, 2020. "Earmarking in the multilateral development system: Many shades of grey," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 101, number 101, March.
    4. Barnett, Michael & Duvall, Raymond, 2005. "Power in International Politics," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(1), pages 39-75, January.
    5. Lake, David A. & Martin, Lisa L. & Risse, Thomas, 2021. "Challenges to the Liberal Order: Reflections on International Organization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(2), pages 225-257, February.
    6. Paul Novosad & Eric Werker, 2019. "Who runs the international system? Nationality and leadership in the United Nations Secretariat," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-33, March.
    7. Amitav Acharya, 2016. "‘Idea-shift’: how ideas from the rest are reshaping global order," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(7), pages 1156-1170, July.
    8. Mao, Ruipeng, 2020. "China's growing engagement with the UNDS as an emerging nation: Changing rationales, funding preferences and future trends," IDOS Discussion Papers 2/2020, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    9. Sebastian Haug, 2021. "A Thirdspace approach to the ‘Global South’: insights from the margins of a popular category," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(9), pages 2018-2038, September.
    10. Andreas Kruck & Bernhard Zangl, 2020. "The Adjustment of International Institutions to Global Power Shifts: A Framework for Analysis," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 5-16, October.
    11. Parizek, Michal & Stephen, Matthew D., 2021. "The Increasing Representativeness of International Organizations’ Secretariats: Evidence from the United Nations System, 1997–2015," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 65(1), pages 197-209.
    12. Stephen, Matthew D., 2014. "States, Norms and Power: Emerging Powers and Global Order," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 42(3), pages 888-896.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenting Meng, 2024. "Is power shifting? China's evolving engagement with UNESCO," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 97-109, May.
    2. Sebastian Haug & Rosemary Foot & Max‐Otto Baumann, 2024. "Power shifts in international organisations: China at the United Nations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 5-17, May.
    3. Haug, Sebastian, 2021. "Mainstreaming South-South and triangular cooperation: Work in progress at the United Nations," IDOS Discussion Papers 15/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    4. Vaclav Vlcek, 2023. "Who cares about the UN General Assembly? National delegations size from 1993 to 2016," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 349-360, May.
    5. Shing‐hon Lam & Courtney J. Fung, 2024. "Personnel power shift? Unpacking China's attempts to enter the UN civil service," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 135-147, May.
    6. Leonard Schuette & Hylke Dijkstra, 2023. "The show must go on: The EU's quest to sustain multilateral institutions since 2016," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(5), pages 1318-1336, September.
    7. Xueying Zhang & Yijia Jing, 2024. "A mixed funding pattern: China's exercise of power within the United Nations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 121-134, May.
    8. Duncan Snidal & Thomas Hale & Emily Jones & Claas Mertens & Karolina Milewicz, 2024. "The power of the “weak” and international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 385-409, September.
    9. Andrew Lugg, 2024. "Re-contracting intergovernmental organizations: Membership change and the creation of linked intergovernmental organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 545-577, September.
    10. Shing-hon Lam & Courtney J. Fung, 2025. "Mapping China’s influence at the United Nations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1151-1180, December.
    11. Sebastian Haug, 2024. "Ronny Patz and Klaus H. Goetz. 2019. Managing Money and Discord in the UN: Budgeting and Bureaucracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press)," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 375-379, April.
    12. Taiwo Adeagbo, 2024. "Taking Populism Seriously: A Focus on Global Economy and the International Organizations," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3), pages 49-67, March.
    13. Lipps, Jana & Jacob, Marc S, 2022. "Undermining Liberal International Organizations from Within: Evidence from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt6fg0093j, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    14. Laura Trajber Waisbich, 2024. "Mobilising international embeddedness to resist radical policy change and dismantling: the case of Brazil under Jair Bolsonaro (2019–2022)," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 57(1), pages 145-169, March.
    15. Christopher Whyte, 2018. "Crossing the Digital Divide: Monism, Dualism and the Reason Collective Action is Critical for Cyber Theory Production," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 73-82.
    16. Matheus Alves Zanella & Ariane Goetz & Stephan Rist & Oscar Schmidt & Jes Weigelt, 2018. "Deliberation in Multi-Stakeholder Participation: A Heuristic Framework Applied to the Committee on World Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Jacob D. Petersen-Perlman & Itay Fischhendler, 2018. "The weakness of the strong: re-examining power in transboundary water dynamics," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 275-294, April.
    18. Julia C. Morse & Bridget Coggins, 2024. "Your silence speaks volumes: Weak states and strategic absence in the UN General Assembly," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 515-544, September.
    19. Woll, Cornelia, 2015. "Politics in the interest of capital: A not-so-organized combat," MaxPo Discussion Paper Series 15/2, Max Planck Sciences Po Center on Coping with Instability in Market Societies (MaxPo).
    20. Dragan Pavlićević, 2019. "Structural power and the China-EU-Western Balkans triangular relations," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 453-468, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:s2:p:51-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.