IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v10y2019i1p122-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Confucian Case for Equal Membership for Foreign Domestic Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Sungmoon Kim

Abstract

Daniel A. Bell, a leading Confucian and communitarian political theorist, objects to equal membership to foreign domestic workers (FDWs) in East Asia on two Confucianism‐inspired normative and practical grounds. Bell's core argument is twofold: first, that liberal‐democratic demand for equal membership, despite its good intention, is likely to backfire, driving the current and potential FDWs into a far worse economic situation and second, that in a Confucian culture what is important is not so much justice but family‐like affective relationships, which, in Bell's view, can be better fostered between employers and FDWs in the absence of equal membership. In this paper, I challenge Bell's two objections from a Confucian perspective by highlighting that the Confucian appreciates the value of equal membership both for intrinsic reasons, finding the unequal citizen status morally demeaning, as well as for instrumental reasons in terms of its contribution to one's moral self‐cultivation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sungmoon Kim, 2019. "A Confucian Case for Equal Membership for Foreign Domestic Workers," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(1), pages 122-129, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:122-129
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12539
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.12539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sungmoon Kim, 2015. "Confucianism, Moral Equality, and Human Rights: A Mencian Perspective," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 149-185, January.
    2. Kim, Tae Wan, 2014. "Confucian Ethics and Labor Rights," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(4), pages 565-594, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhu, Qin, 2020. "Ethics, society, and technology: A Confucian role ethics perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Jae Hyeung Kang & James G. Matusik & Lizabeth A. Barclay, 2017. "Affective and Normative Motives to Work Overtime in Asian Organizations: Four Cultural Orientations from Confucian Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 115-130, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:122-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.