IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v33y2026i4p1480-1492.html

Theorizing Patriarchy Against a Backdrop of Workplace Sexism and Stress in UK Academia

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Baron
  • Charlotte Barrow

Abstract

Our analysis investigates the distinct relationship between sexism and workplace stress as experienced by women academics in the UK higher education system. We argue that due to the insufficient literature on this issue there is a limited knowledge base of the harmful psychological effects of stress in the workplace upon women academics in the UK university sector. In applying the concept of “gender regime” through a feminist lens we explain how the patriarchal, neoliberal university is a site of sexist discrimination, producing psychosocial health hazards in the workplace resulting in stressful experiences unique to women academics. The methodology employed in the study was a combined feminist and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) approach using semi‐structured interviews to generate qualitative data. The sample included detailed interviews with seven women academics. Three themes were identified; exclusion, discrimination, and gendered divisions of labor as categories to illustrate how the gender regime manifests itself to cause stress in the workplace. Our data also suggested that the presence of men in leadership roles was associated with a higher frequency of sexist incidents compared to women‐led management teams. To challenge such discrimination and the consequential experiences of workplace stress for women academics, we argue for recommendations that go beyond the micro agentic level implementing transformative change at the meso institutional level. These proposals include positive action equality programs, equitable and transparent recruitment/promotion procedures, access to full participation in all forms of academic work, statutory equality training programs for senior leadership postholders, and effective support mechanisms for employees with caring responsibilities. Simultaneously, we contend that any analysis of organizational gender regimes within UK universities needs to be recognized as originating from the wider macro patriarchal structural context.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Baron & Charlotte Barrow, 2026. "Theorizing Patriarchy Against a Backdrop of Workplace Sexism and Stress in UK Academia," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1480-1492, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:4:p:1480-1492
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70133
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heather Savigny, 2017. "Cultural Sexism is Ordinary: Writing and Re-Writing Women in Academia," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 643-655, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhavika Sicka, 2025. "Liberatory Motherhood: A Framework & Praxis for Caring and Scholaring Otherwise in the Neoliberal Academy," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 1834-1849, September.
    2. Mónica Lopes & Virgínia Ferreira & Caynnã Santos, 2023. "Gendered Micropolitics in Academic Work Environments: Uncovering Microaggressions during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Y. Shymko & N. Vershinina & M. Daskalaki & G. Azevedo & C. Quental, 2024. "From the cocoon to la chape de plomb: The birth and persistence of silence around sexism in academia," Post-Print hal-04680678, HAL.
    4. Lilith A. Whiley, 2021. "What can critical femininity offer reviewing? A case for reviewing with empathy," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 1638-1642, July.
    5. Kirsten Locke & Rebecca W. B. Lund & Susan Wright, 2021. "Rethinking gender equity in the contaminated university: A methodology for listening for music in the ruins," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 1079-1097, May.
    6. Marta Kosińska & Karolina Sikorska, 2026. "Navigating Neoliberal Pressures and Patriarchal Legacies: The Lasting Impact of Feudal–Patriarchal Work Relations in Polish Artistic Universities," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 379-398, March.
    7. Marian Crowley‐Henry & Shamika Almeida & Santina Bertone & Asanka Gunasekara, 2025. "Understanding Female White Migrant Academics' Career Narratives: An Intersectional Feminist Standpoint Approach," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 2149-2162, November.
    8. Lima, João Paulo Resende de & Casa Nova, Silvia Pereira de Castro & Vendramin, Elisabeth de Oliveira, 2024. "Sexist academic socialization and feminist resistance: (de)constructing women’s (dis)placement in Brazilian accounting academia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    9. Anna‐Liisa Kaasila‐Pakanen, 2021. "Close encounters: Creating embodied spaces of resistance to marginalization and disempowering representation of difference in organization," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 1805-1822, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:4:p:1480-1492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.